became thin slices, the subdivision going on ad infinitum. There were those in whose houses one may dine, and also those to whose houses one may go only for the evening. Those in whose houses one may not dine, but to which one may go for the evening. Those whom one may receive at his table, and those to whom one may accord only admission to his salon, â€” and even then only under certain circumstances, clearly defined. There were also those in whose houses one may not dine and whom one should not receive at one's house, and those whom one may receive at one's house and in whose houses one may not dine ; those whom one may receive at breakfast, and never at dinner ; and those in whose country houses one may dine, but never in their Paris residences, etc. The whole being supported with demonstrative and peremptory examples, well-known names being cited by way of illustration.
"Shades," said the Viscount Lahyrais, sports- man, clubman, gambler, and trickster. ' ' The whole thing lies there. It is by the strict observ- ance of shades that a man is really in society, or is not."
I believe that I never heard such dreary things. As I listened to them, I really felt a pity for these unfortunates.
Charrigaud neither ate or drank, and said nothing. Although he was