Page:A critical and exegetical commentary on Genesis (1910).djvu/273

This page needs to be proofread.

the avenger of blood is to J (ch. 4) a truth of nature; to P it rests on a positive enactment.—from the hand of every beast] see Ex. 2128f..—6a is remarkable for its assonances and the perfect symmetry of the two members: (Symbol missingHebrew characters) | (Symbol missingHebrew characters). It is possibly an ancient judicial formula which had become proverbial (Gu.). The TT?] (v.i.) read into the text the idea of judicial procedure; others (Tu. al.) suppose the law of blood-revenge to be contemplated. In reality the manner of execution is left quite indefinite.—6b. The reason for the higher value set on the life of man. On the image of God see on 126f..—7. The section closes, as it began, with the note of benediction.

8-17. The Covenant and its Sign.—In P as in J (820-22) the story of the Flood closes with an assurance that the world shall never again be visited by such a catastrophe; and in both the promise is absolute, not contingent on the behaviour of the creatures. In P it takes the form of a covenant between God and all flesh,—the first of two covenants by which (according to this writer) the relations of the Almighty to His creatures are regulated. On the content and scope of this Noachic covenant, see the concluding note, p. 173 f.—9. establish my covenant] in fulfilment of 618. P's formula for the inauguration of the covenant is always (Symbol missingHebrew characters) or (Symbol missingHebrew characters) (172, Nu. 2512) instead of the more ancient and technical (Symbol missingHebrew characters).—11. The essence of the covenant is that the earth shall never be devastated by a Flood. Whether its idea be exhausted by this assurance


one man that of another.' The full expression would be (Symbol missingHebrew characters) (Ols.); but all languages use breviloquence in the expression of reciprocity. The construction is hardly more difficult than in 1510 4225. 35; and an exact parallel occurs in Zec. 710. See G-K. § 139 c; Bu. 283 ff. The (Symbol missingHebrew characters) of [E] SV makes nonsense; G omits the previous (Symbol missingHebrew characters). It would be better to move the Athnach so as to commence a new clause with (Symbol missingHebrew characters).—6. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] V om.; TO (Symbol missingHebrew characters): TJ is still more explicit.—7. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] V et implete eam (as v.1). Read (Symbol missingHebrew characters) after 128 (Nestle in Ball).

10. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] 'as many as'; see on 62.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] G om.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] perhaps = 'in short': cf. 2310, see G-K. § 143 e. The sense of (Symbol missingHebrew characters) = 'animals' in general, immediately after the same expression in the sense of 'wild animals,' makes the phrase suspicious (Ho.).—11. (Symbol missingHebrew characters)] [E] (Symbol missingHebrew characters);