events of the past half -century that its influence was less than in
any other spot in Christendom. Even in Aragon the Council of
Tarragona, in 1238, felt itself compelled to decree excommunication against those who composed or applauded lampoons against
the clergy. The abuse of the interdict had grown to such proportions that Innocent IV., in 1243, and again in 1245, was obliged
to forbid its employment throughout southern France, in all places
suspected of heresy, because it afforded to heretics so manifold an
occasion of asserting that it was used for private interests, and not
for the salvation of souls. During the troubles which followed
after the crusade of Louis VIII. the bishops had taken advantage
of the confusion to seize many lands to which they had no claim,
and this involved them in endless quarrels with the royal fisc in the
territories which fell to the king, while in those which remained
to Eaymond, the pious St. Louis was forced to interfere to obtain
for him a restoration of what they obstinately refused to surrender. The Church itself was so deeply tainted with heresy that
the faithful were scandahzed at seeing the practical immunity en-
joyed by heretical clerks, owing to the difficulty of assembling a
sufficient number of bishops to officiate at their degradation, and
Gregory IX. felt it necessary, in 1233, to decree that in such cases
a single bishop, with some of his abbots, should have power to
deprive them of holy orders and deliver them to the secular arm
to be burned—a provision which he subsequently embodied in the
canon law. Innocent IV., moreover, in 1245, felt called upon to
order his legate in Languedoc to see that no one suspected of heresy was elected or consecrated as bishop. On the other hand,
priests who were zealous in aiding the Inquisition sometimes found
that the enmities thus excited rendered it impossible for them to
reside in their parishes, as occurred in the case of Guillem Pierre,
a priest of Narbonne, in 1246, who on this account was allowed to
employ a vicar and to hold a plurahty of benefices. About the
same time Innocent IV. felt obliged to express his surprise that
the prelates disobeyed his repeated commands to assist the Inquisition; he has trustworthy information that they neglect to do so, and he threatens them roundly with his displeasure unless they manifest greater zeal. Bernard Gui, indeed, speaks of the bishops who favored Count Raymond as among the craftiest and most dangerous enemies of the inquisitors. The natural antagonism
Page:A history of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages, volume 2.djvu/19
POSITION OF THE CHURCH.
3