were exhumed and exposed to the dogs, after which his bones were scattered in the fields; the writings of the enthusiasts were forbidden to be read; the study of natural science in the univer- sity was suspended for three years, and the works of Aristotle, which had given rise to the heresy, were publicly burned.[1]
The doctrine of impeccability was likely to give loosened rein to human passion in those whose spiritual exaltation did not lift them above the weakness of the flesh, and there may be truth in the accusations current against the Amaurians, that the disciples of both sexes abandoned themselves to scandalous license, under the pretext of yielding to the demands of Christian love. Yet the popular designation of Papelards bestowed on the sectaries show that they at least preserved an exterior of sanctity and de- votion, and that they prudently abstained from putting into prac- tice their theories of the uselessness of the sacraments and of all external cult. The heresy was thus crushed in its birthplace, where we hear no more of it except that there were teachers of it in Dauphiné, where they were confounded with the Waldenses, and that in 1225 Honorius III. ordered the destruction of the Periphyseos of Eri- gena, which was thought to have given rise to Amauri's specula- tions. The seed, however, was widely scattered, to bear fruit in foreign soil. The University of Paris drew together eager search- ers after knowledge from every country in Europe, and it could not be difficult for the Amaurians to find among those from abroad converts who would prove useful missionaries. In 1215, Robert de Curzon includes the works of a certain Maurice the Spaniard in his condemnation of those of David and Amauri. An- other disciple is said to have been Ortlieb of Strassburg, the teacher of the sectaries known by his name whose fate we have seen at
Strassburg. That the heresy was known not to be extinguished
- ↑ Rigordus de Gest. Phil. Aug. ann. 1210.—Chron. Canon Laudunens. ann. 1212.—Chron. de Mailros ann. 1210.—Chron. Turonens. ann. 1210.—Cæsar. Heisterb. v. 22.—Chron. Breve S. Dionys. ann. 1209.—Grandes Chroniques, IV. 139.—Guillel Brito (Bouquet XVII. 82 sqq.).—D'Argentré, Coll. Judic. I. I. 128-33.—Harduin Concil. VI. II. 1994.—Chron. Engelhusii (Leibnitz, S. Rer. Brunsv. II. 1113).William the goldsmith, under the title of Gulielmus Aurifex, retains his place in the Index Librorum Prohibitorum to the present day (Migne, Dictionnaire de Hérésies, II. 1056). Cf. Reusch, Der Index der verbotenen Bücher, I. 17.
