Page:A history of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages, volume 2.djvu/473

This page needs to be proofread.
THE JOURNEY TO CONSTANCE.
457

bishop, who was also papal legate, and who declared that he knew of nothing to render Huss guilty except that he ought to purge himself of the excommunication. Of this a certified notarial instrument was sent to Sigismund by Huss with the statement that under the imperial safe-conduct he was ready to go to Constance to defend publicly the faith for which he was prepared, if necessary, to die.[1]

Huss set out, October 11, 1414, under the escort and protection of John and Henry of Chlum and Wenceslas of Duba, all his friends, and delegated for the purpose by Sigismund. The cavalcade consisted of more than thirty horse and two carriages. It was preceded, a day in advance, by the Bishop of Lubec, who announced that Huss was being carried in chains to Constance, and warned the people not to look at him, as he could read men's minds. Already his name had filled all Germany, and this advertisement was an additional incentive for crowds to gather and gaze on him as he passed. His reception served to foster the fatal illusions which he nursed. Everywhere, he wrote to his friends, he was treated as an honored guest and not as an excommunicate; no interdict was proclaimed where he stopped to rest, and he held discussions with magistrates and ecclesiastics. In all cities he posted notices on the church-doors that he was on his way to Constance to defend his faith, and that any one who desired to assail it was invited to do so before the council. On reaching Nuremburg, October 19, in place of deflecting to seek King Sigismund and obtain the promised safe-conduct, he proceeded direct to Constance, while Wenceslas of Duba went to the court and brought the document to him there a few days after his arrival. It was dated October 18.[2]

On November 2 Huss reached Constance, to be greeted by a crowd of twelve thousand men assembled to look upon the dread- ed reforming heretic. The council had not yet been opened. On the 10th a letter from one of the party states that as yet no ambassadors from any of the kings had arrived, and though John

  1. Mladenowic Relatio (Palacky Documenta, p. 237).—Von der Hardt IV. 754.—Jo. Hus Monument. I. 2-4, 57, 68.—Palacky Documenta, pp. 70, 73.
  2. Richentals Chronik des Constanzer Concils p. 76 (Tübingen, 1882).—Jo. Hus Epistt. iii. vi. (Monument. I. 57-8).—Monument. I. 4a.