Page:A history of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages, volume 3.djvu/214

This page needs to be proofread.

198 POLITICAL HERESY.— THE CHURCH. came not as an apostle, but as a robber. A devastating war ensued, with little advantage to the papalists, but the spiritual sword proved more effective than the temporal. May 26, 1321, the sentence of condemnation was solemnly promulgated in the Church of San Stefano at Basseguano, and was repeated by the inquisitors March 14, 1322, at Valenza.* Strange as it may seem, these proceedings appear to have had a decisive influence on public opinion. It is true that when, in the seventeenth century, Paolo Sarpi alluded to these transactions and assumed that Matteo's only crime was his adherence to Louis of Bavaria, Cardinal Albizio admitted the fact, and argued that those who adhered to a schismatic and heretic emperor, and disregarded the censures of the Church, rendered themselves suspect of heresy and became formal heretics. Yet this was not the impression at the time, and John had recognized that something more was re- quired than such a charge of mere technical heresy. The Continua- tion of Xangis, which reflects with fidelity the current of popular thought, recounts the sins of Matteo and his sons, described in the papal sentence, as a new heresy arisen in Lombardy, and the papalist military operations as a righteous crusade for its suppres- sion. Although this was naturally a French view of the matter, it was not confined to France. In Lombardy Matteo's friends were discouraged and his enemies took fresh heart. A peace party speedily formed itself in Milan, and the question was openly asked whether the whole region should be sacrificed for the sake of one man. In spite of Matteo's success in buying off Frederic of Aus- tria, whom John had bribed with gold and promises to intervene with an army, the situation grew untenable even for his seasoned nerves. It is, perhaps, worthy of mention that Francesco Gar- bagnate, the old Guglielmite, association with whom was one of the proofs of heresy alleged against Matteo, was one of the efficient

  • Preger, Die Politik des Pabstes Johann XXII., Miincben, 1885, pp. 6-10,

21. — Petrarchi Lib. sine Titulo Epist. xviii. — Raynald. ann. 1317, No. 27; ann. 1320, No. 10-14; ann. 1322, No. 6-8, 11.— Bernard. Corio, Hist, Milanese, ann. 1318, 1320, 1321-22. A bull of John XXII., Jan. 28, 1322, ordering the sale of indulgences to aid the crusade of Cardinal Bertrand, recites the heresy of Visconti and his refusal to obey the summons for his trial as the reason for assailing him. — Regest. CJem. PP. V., Romae, 1885. T. I. Prolegom. p. cxcviii.