USCA11 Case: 18-13592 Date Filed: 07/14/2021 Page: 80 of 80
policy it wishes Adams had challenged, misconstrues it, and continues to discount students’ sex-specific privacy interests. But once again, for all of its errors, the majority opinion cannot obscure what should have been the bottom line of this appeal all along: there is nothing unlawful, under either the Constitution or federal law, about a policy that separates bathrooms for schoolchildren on the basis of sex.
I dissent.
80
