Page:American Historical Review, Vol. 23.djvu/174

elsewhere. The author has used parliamentary reports, South African newspapers, memoirs, and private information to good effect. The story of Botha's work as premier of the Transvaal, of his part in shaping the Union, of his policies as premier of South Africa, of his handling of the Hertzog split and of the labor crisis, of his quick suppression of the rebellion of 1914, and of his swift invasion of German Southwest Africa is well told. The twistings and involutions of South African politics are straightened out in workmanlike fashion. It becomes easier to account for the Boer support of Britain in 1914. That support was the outcome of the policy of a man of great natural shrewdness and remarkable capacity for growth, who not only mastered in a few years the ins and outs of the English party system and the duties of party leadership, but also caught the conception of British imperialism. It may be that the author gives Botha more than his due, and it is probable that he has interpreted South African politics from the standpoint of a watcher at Westminster. He has drawn a great man, whose policy in the last two years is the finest tribute to imperialism—of the Liberal kind.

Wallace Notestein.

 

Les Origines du Pangermanisme (1800 à 1888). Avec une Préface par Charles Andler, Professeur à l'Université de Paris. [Collection de Documents sur le Pangermanisme traduits de l'Allemand publiés sous la Direction de M. Charles Andler.] (Paris: Louis Conard. 1915. Pp. lviii, 335.)

Le Pangermanisme Continental sous Guillaume II. (de 1888 à 1914). By the same. (Ibid. 1915. Pp. lxxxiii, 480.)

Le Pangermanisme Colonial sous Guillaume II. (de 1888 à 1914). By the same. (Ibid. 1916. Pp. c, 335.)

Le Pangermanisme Philosophique (1800 à 1914). By the same (Ibid. 1917. Pp. clii, 398.) (25 frs. for the four vols.)

One of the immediate results of the war is the realization that the history of Austro-German statecraft and diplomacy since 1870 must be rewritten in the light of the war of 1914 and of Pan-Germanism. German history written for us by Germans—and it has dominated by mere weight of erudition the studies of foreign students—has been a defense, a justification, a background for the war of 1914 itself which would convince the German people and, if possible, other nations as well, of the justifiability and necessity of the war when it should be fought. It was however a history in which real aims and policies could not appear; it must create the essential foundations for a structure whose existence must be unsuspected until "the day" dawned. While it would be idle to deny that there is much truth in the history of Germany as German scholars have written it, and absurd to suppose that the overwhelming