Therein lies the superiority of the parliamentary system over the plebiscite. It has been observed that direct popular votes seldom show a majority for original and bold measures. The popular majority is rather on the side of caution, convenience, and triviality. The single representative, whom the mass chooses, possesses still other personal qualities besides those which—especially during the epochs of purely partisan choices—are in the consciousness of the electing multitude. He brings to his post something in addition to that which was really chosen in selecting him. Hence in parliaments personal talents and intellectual shadings, such as are found only in single persons, may win a high degree of influence. They may even be able to promote the stability of the group by exerting influence that reaches over the gaps between parties which so often
Page:American Journal of Sociology Volume 3.djvu/706
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/American_Journal_of_Sociology_Volume_3.djvu/page706-1024px-American_Journal_of_Sociology_Volume_3.djvu.jpg)