Page:Archaeological Journal, Volume 4.djvu/18

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
6
ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF BRONZE CELTS.

As celts of the fourth class we have figs, i, k, and l, in which the wedge for insertion is set aside, doubtless from the fact of its weakening the handle, and we have a socketed implement with the addition of the ear, when the implement was to be used as an axe, and without it when it was intended to be used as a chisel, as in fig. k. The method of fastening this celt is shewn in fig. l[1].


Length, 4 in.

Length, 31/2.

Length, 31/2.
[2]

We may readily imagine that when a weapon such as that last noticed was in use, the tying, which extended from the ear round the handle, must have been exposed to frequent injury, and from its nature easily cut through, and then a few succeeding blows of the weapon would detach the blade from the haft. As a precaution against such a casualty we find the bronze ring looped to the ear of the celt, (fig. l,) and which might have assisted in fastening it, as I have shewn in the sketches here given; the second ring being applicable to either of two purposes, as a catch for a string guard, to be fastened to the wrist, or to render the tying of the larger, ring to the handle more easy and direct. George V. Du Noyer.

  1. Compare the repesentations of celts attached to their handles, given by Sir Samuel Meyrick, Skelton's Goodrich Court Armoury, vol. i. pl. XLVII.
  2. Upon the large ring in this remarkable specimen, now preserved in the British Museum, there is a bead apparently of jet. This curious celt was found near Tadcaster in Yorkshire. It was exhibited to the Society of Antiquaries by Mr. John Crosse, March 5, 1807, and is engraved in Archæol., vol. xvi. pl. 54.