- 2 -
| The test for whether Valve's conduct was in Australia | [159] | |
| Where the conduct relied upon took place | [170] | |
| Whether Valve carries on business in Australia | [189] | |
| (4) Issue 4: Did the representations contravene s 18(1) or s 29(1)(m)? | [206] | |
| The legal principles concerning s 18(1) and s 29(1)(m) | [207] | |
| Summary of the alleged representations | [229] | |
| The SSA representations | [233] | |
| Representation 1 (in the SSAs) | [237] | |
| Representations 2 and 3 (in the SSAs) | [247] | |
| Representation 4 (in the 2011–2013 and 2013–2014 Steam Refund Policy) 553, 555, 349 | [257] | |
| Representation 5 (in the 2014–2015 Steam Refund Policy) | [275] | |
| Representations 6, 7, 8, and 9 (in the online chats): the ACCC's case and the statements made | [284] | |
| Representations 6, 7, 8, and 9: the submissions and conclusions | [329] | |
| Conclusion | [353] | |
