I have tried (with some success, I hope) to
show that hair is a disadvantage, but this view
derives no support from the scissors. If the
hair of men were obviously, conspicuously
beneficial; if it made them healthy, wealthy
and as wise as they care to be; if they needed
it in their business; if they could not at all get
on without it — they would doubtless cut it a
little oftener and a little closer than they do
now. Men are that way.
The truth of the matter is plain enough. Men become bald because they keep cutting their hair. Every man has a certain amount of capillary energy, so to say. He can produce such a length of hair and no more, as the spider can spin only so much web and then must cease to be a spinster. By cutting the hair we keep it exhausting its allowance of energy by growth ; when all is gone growth stops, and the roots, having no longer a use, decay. By letting their hair grow as long as it will women retain it. The difference is the same as that between two coils of rope, equal in length, one of which is constantly payed out, the other not. If this explanation do not compose the immemorial controversy about the cause of men's baldness the prospect of its composure by that phenomenon's universality
