Min. Euclid's series consists of Ax. 12, Props. 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 15, 16, 27, 28. I will grant you as much of that series as you have proved by methods not radically differing from his.
Nie. That is, you grant us Props. 4, 13, and 15. Prop. 16 is not in our treatise. The next we require is Prop. 6.
Min. That you may take as proved.
Nie. And, next to that, Prop. 20: that we assume as an Axiom, and from it, with the help of Prop. 6, we deduce Prop. 19.
Min. For our present purpose you may take Prop. 19 as proved.
Nie. From Props. 13 and 19 we deduce Prop. 32; and from that, Ax. 12; from which Prop. 29 follows at once.
Min. Your proof of Prop. 32 is long, but beautiful. I need not, however, enter on a discussion of its merits. It is enough to say that what we require is a proof suited to the capacities of beginners, and that this Theorem of yours (Prop, xix, at p. 20) contains an infinite series of Triangles, an infinite series of angles, the terms of which continually decrease so as to be ultimately less than any assigned angle, and magnitudes which vanish simultaneously. These considerations seem to me to settle the question. I fear that your proof of this Theorem, though a model of elegance and perspicuity as a study for the advanced student, is wholly unsuited to the requirements of a beginner.
Nie. That we are not prepared to dispute.
Min. It seems superfluous, after saying this, to ask what test for the meeting of Lines you have provided:
