the detriment of the other. In general estimation, however, the Bēris are deemed a little inferior to the Kōmatis." *[1] The claim of the Bēri Chettis to be Vaisyas is based on the following legend, as given by Mr. Stuart.†[2] " In the time of the Chōlas, they erected a water-pandal, and Kōmatis claimed the right to use it, which was at once denied. The king attempted to solve the question by reference to inscriptions in the Kāmākshiamma temple at Conjeeveram, but without success. He then proposed that the rivals should submit to the ordeal of carrying water in an unbaked pot. This was agreed to, and the Bēri Chettis were alone successful. The penalty for failure was a fine of Rs. 12,000, which the Kōmatis could not pay, and they were therefore obliged to enslave themselves to a Bēri Chetti woman, who paid the fine. Their descendants are still marked men, who depend upon Bēri Chettis for their subsistence. The great body of the kōmatis in the country were not parties to the agreement, and they do not now admit that their inferiority has ever been proved." According to another version of the legend, during the reign of the Chōlas, a water-pandal was erected by the Bēris, and the Kōmatis claimed the right to use it. This was refused on the ground that they were not Vaisyas. The question at issue was referred to the king, who promised to enquire into it, but did not do so. A Vīramushti (caste beggar of the Bēri Chettis and Kōmatis) killed the king's horse and elephant. When questioned as to his reason for so doing, he explained that it was to call the king's attention to the dispute, and restored the animals to life. The king then referred both parties to Conjeeveram, where a
Page:Castes and Tribes of Southern India.djvu/328
BERI CHETTI
214
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Castes_and_Tribes_of_Southern_India.djvu/page328-1024px-Castes_and_Tribes_of_Southern_India.djvu.jpg)