INTRODUCTION.
xxxix
details of the cephalic indices of typical classes in the five linguistic areas under consideration are recorded:—
| (a) Tulu. Billava. | ||
| 71 | ♦♦ | |
| 72 | ♦♦ | |
| 73 | ♦ | |
| 74 | ||
| 75 | ||
| 76 | ♦♦♦ | |
| 77 | ♦♦♦♦♦ | |
| 78 | ♦♦♦♦♦♦ | |
| 79 | ♦♦ | |
| 80 | ♦♦ | Average |
| 81 | ♦♦♦ | |
| 82 | ♦♦♦♦♦ | |
| 83 | ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ | |
| 84 | ♦♦♦♦ | |
| 85 | ♦♦♦♦ | |
| 86 | ♦ | |
| 87 | ||
| 88 | ||
| 89 | ||
| 90 | ♦ | |
| 91 | ♦ | |
| (b) Canerese. Vakkaliga. | ||
| 73 | ♦ | |
| 74 | ||
| 75 | ♦♦ | |
| 76 | ♦♦♦♦♦ | |
| 77 | ♦♦ | |
| 78 | ♦♦♦♦♦ | |
| 79 | ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ | |
| 80 | ♦♦ | |
| 81 | ♦♦♦ | |
| 82 | ♦♦♦ | Average. |
| 83 | ♦♦♦ | |
| 84 | ♦♦ | |
| 85 | ♦♦♦ | |
| 86 | ♦♦♦ | |
