Page:ChroniclesofEarlyMelbournevol.1.pdf/406

This page needs to be proofread.

CHAPTER XXVIII. REMARKABLE SUPREME COURT

TRIALS—CONTINUED.

SYNOPSIS—Action against a Crown lands Commissioner, Sprot v. Fyans.—William Dobson, Murder on Board the "Kestrel."- - George Brady, Convicted op Robbery. —Murder op Mr. A. Beveridge, Junr—Libel, Cavenagh v. Boursiquot.— "An Ode to an Esquire."—Murder in Gippsland ; Healey, alias "Pretty Boy," Sentenced to Death. —Moor v. Kerr, First Libel Action against the "Argus."—Bribe offered to Crown Prosecutor.—A " Pentonvillian " Murderer.—Moor v. Kerr, Second Libel Action against the " Argus."—St. John v. Fawkner, Libel.—Robbery of the Warrnambool Mail. — O'Shanassy v. Johnstone, Assault on the Racecourse.—Devlin and Jones, Robbing the Portland Mail.—Desailly v. William P, Horsewhipping. Moor v. Wilson and another, Third Libel Action against the "Argus."—Wife Murder at Mount Rouse. —Two Unavenged Murders.

ACTION AGAINST A CROWN LANDS COMMISSIONER.—14TH AUGUST, 1845.

Sprot v. Fyans. fEFORE Judge Therry and a special jury. The declaration contained tyvo counts ; damages laid at £ 2 0 0 0 . Plea, the general issue. Counsel for plaintiff, Messrs. Cunninghame and Williams; ) for the defendant, Messrs. Croke and Barry. T h e complainant yvas Mr. Alexander Sprot, a settler in the Portland Bay district, and the defendant Captain Foster Fyans, Commissioner of Crown Lands for the same circuit. In November, 1841, a Mr. Muston had a number of sheep and cattle on a station at Muston's Creek, which he sold to a Mr. Osbrey. T h e sheep numbered 500, the cattle 50, and part of the run, as agreed upon, was to be given in. In 1842, Osbrey obtained a depasturing license for the slice of land that went with his purchase, and a Mr. Charles Payne purchased the residue of the run. W h e n Payne got into possession, he complained to the Crown Lands Commissioner of certain encroachments of the other, and Osbrey received a letter from the Commissioner intimating that he had no right to any part of the run, that Payne was entitled to the whole, and that he should clear out. A fortnight after a peremptory notice to quit was given, and Osbrey accordingly vacated the place, when Payne's overseer took possession of the empty hut and made things comfortable there. Matters so remained for some months, yvhen Fyans, in the course of an official visitation, called at the place, and, from personal observation, satisfied himself that Osbrey was the rightful owner. H e accordingly gave him a certificate authorising the issue of a depasturing license to him. Osbrey remained in possession until January, 1843, when he sold to Sprot, and shortly after the latter went into occupation. Payne yvent to yvork again with Fyans—and so effectually, too, that Fyans placed him once more in possession and Sprot had to decamp. This trial lasted five days, and completely fagged everyone connected with it. At length a three-fourths verdict was taken, by which damages were assessed at £ 2 0 0 . S o m e points of law were reserved, and subsequently a new trial was moved for upon seventeen different grounds. T h e matter did not, hoyvever, proceed further, as a compromise yvas effected. Sprot having gained a verdict, and thereby established the principle he was fighting for relinquished the £ 2 0 0 . T h e Crown afterwards paid the defendant's costs. A BUSH MURDER.—20TH JANUARY, 1846.

Two men, named Thomas Were and Thomas Simpson, were together at Buninyong on the 28th November, 1845. Simpson was the owner of a mare and foal. T h e m e n went away in company, and on the 4th December the dead body of Simpson was found in the bush, with the skull smashed in,