This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

practice does not recur; and, how the corrective action(s) is being monitored to ensure the deficient practice does not recur.

D5481
The laboratory's allegation of compliance is not credible and evidence of correction is not acceptable.

Finding #1

The submission references "Ex. I, Tabs 2-6." We located these tabs, but found no documentation in Tabs 2, 5 and 6.

Although the laboratory's submitted protocol requires that QC values be acceptable prior to reporting patient results, the submission states: "Theranos reviewed all quality control (QC) data for PT/INR [Prothombin Time/International Normalized Ratio] for the time period that this lot of Dade Innovin was in use." The laboratory provided no documentation of this review other than stating it was performed. We also found no documentation to indicate that the revised standard operating procedures (SOPS) have been effectuated. That is, we found no documentation of PT/INR QC failure investigations and corrective actions taken based on the revised SOPS.

In Ex. I, the laboratory provided lists of patient specimen accession numbers for which the laboratory intended to issue corrected test reports. The laboratory provided no documentation to indicate corrected reports were issued. We also note that the Patient Impact Assessment (Ex. I, Tab 1) states that "remedial action was taken on 9/25/15," but "corrected reports were issued beginning on 11/10/15 and completed on 11/12/15." There was no explanation as to why there was such a long period of time between the remedial action and issuing corrected reports.

To ensure the deficient practice does not recur, the laboratory indicated that quarterly audits will be performed and suggested that the audits results would be reviewed within the laboratory's QMPI Program. However, the laboratory did not establish the procedure by which these quarterly audits are to be conducted. In its submission, the laboratory indicates that a "tracer audit may [emphasis added] be used," but did not provided a protocol for a "tracer audit," the means by which a "tracer audit" would be documented, and whether the results of a "tracer audit" would be the information reviewed by the QMPI Program.

The laboratory failed to address and provide acceptable evidence of correction consisting of: what measure has been put in place or what systemic changes have been made to ensure the deficient practice does not recur; and, how the corrective action(s) is being monitored to ensure the deficient practice does not recur.

Finding #2

Although the laboratory submitted a QC protocol (Ex. A, Tab 9), the laboratory's submission did not include an updated protocol for QC specific to the Theranos Proprietary Devices. The reference protocol states at §§ 8.1.9-8.1.10:

No instrument or test method can be used for the purpose of performing a test to report a result to a patient prior to having passed all required QC procedures at least once for the

17