This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

which a "tracer audit" would be documented, and whether the results of a "tracer audit" would be the information reviewed by the QMPI Program.

The laboratory failed to address and provide acceptable evidence of correction consisting of: what measure has been put in place or what systemic changes have been made to ensure the deficient practice does not recur; and, how the corrective action(s) is being monitored to ensure the deficient practice does not recur.

D5793
The laboratory's allegation of compliance is not credible and evidence of correction is not acceptable.

Finding #1
See our review of D5403, D5437, D5469, and D5779.

Finding #2
In the submission, the laboratory states:

"Based on comprehensive review, multiple examples of failed QC without the appropriate documentation with no investigation or corrective action was identified which is now addressed with revised SOPS and training. Additional competency is on-going to ensure CLS demonstrate the required proficiency with quality control and the appropriate investigation, corrective action and notification."

We find no documentation to indicate that the "revised SOPS" have been effectuated. That is, we find no documentation of cytometry QC failure investigations and corrective actions taken based on the "revised SOPS" as discovered while conducting the "comprehensive review."

In Ex. J, the laboratory provided lists of patient specimen accession numbers for which the laboratory intended to issue corrected test reports. The laboratory provided no documentation to indicate corrected reports were generated and issued.

To ensure the deficient practice does not recur, the laboratory indicated that quarterly audits will be performed and suggested that the audits results would be reviewed within the laboratory's QMPI Program. However, the laboratory did not establish the procedure by which these quarterly audits are to be conducted. In its submission, the laboratory indicates that a "tracer audit may [emphasis added] be used," but did not provided a protocol for a "tracer audit," the means by which a "tracer audit" would be documented, and whether the results of a "tracer audit" would be the information reviewed by the QMPI Program.

The laboratory failed to address and provide acceptable evidence of correction consisting of: what measure has been put in place or what systemic changes have been made to ensure the deficient practice does not recur; and, how the corrective action(s) is being monitored to ensure the deficient practice does not recur.

Finding #3

24