effect capable of photographic development, owing to rapid self-recovery.
3. Relapse of the Invisible Image
The above considerations afford a simple explanation of the very obscure phenomenon of the relapse of the invisible image. Recovery is merely a question of time. With certain substances it is immediate, with others it takes a longer time, as in a daguerreotype, where the latent image disappears in the course of several hours. In ordinary photographic plates the recovery may not take place for several years. We have seen how the strain effect of electric radiation was transient in some cases, whereas it was more persistent in others.
It is evident that in order to make the after-effect more or less permanent, and thus render it developable, self-recovery should be retarded. There are two ways in which the after-effect may be rendered comparatively permanent: (1) Even a highly elastic substance may be rendered more or less permanently distorted by straining it beyond the limit of elastic recovery; or (2) the presence of a retarding substance may prevent the self-recovery of the sensitive material. One of the chief functions of the so-called sensitisers may pobably be in preventing self-recovery and rendering the after-effect permanent.
4. Permanence of the After-effect by Overstrain
Thus in many cases where images cannot be secured with ordinary exposure, they can be obtained with excessive strain caused by prolonged exposure. Thus Moser obtained an invisible image on a clean silver plate by
