Page:Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, A - Karl Marx.djvu/111

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
— 105 —

labor based on the production of commodities becomes social labor only through universal alienation of individual labors. But by assuming that the labor-time contained in commodities is directly social labor-time. Gray assumes it to be common labor-time or labor-time of directly associated individuals. Under such conditions a specific commodity like gold or silver could not confront other commodities as the incarnation of universal labor, and exchange value would not be turned into price; but, on the other hand, use-value would not become exchange value, products would not become commodities and thus the very foundation of the capitalistic system of production would be removed. But that is not what Gray has in mind. Products are to be produced as commodities, hut are not to be exchanged as commodities. He entrusts a national bank with the carrying out of this pious wish. On the one hand, society, through the bank, makes individuals independent of the conditions of private exchange, and on the other, it allows them to go on producing on the basis of private exchange. The logic of things, however, compels Gray to do away with one condition of capitalistic production after another, although he wishes to "reform" only the money system which results from the exchange of commodities. Thus he transforms capital into national capital,[1] land into national property,[2]


  1. "The business of every country ought to be conducted on a national capital." John Gray, "The Social System," etc., p. 171.
  2. "The land to be transformed into national property." L. c. p. 298.