Page:Conversations, between James Block, Esq. and Millar, the editor of the Monthly Miscellany.pdf/3

This page has been validated.

3

Millar—I think, Mr Block, you have a great deal of impudence, to come and treat me in such a manner in my own shop, whatever I said in my discourse on Saturday evening, I had a right to do so, independent of you, Sir. If you had attended upon that discourse yourself, and heard with your own ears, what I said, you would not have had the smallest reason to be in a passion about any expression that I used that evening, concerning these Characters you mention.

Block. It may be so, perhaps I may have got a bad (illegible text)et of it.

Millar. I recollect quite well, Sir, of that part of my discourse to which you allude. My Essay was upon "The causes of the different Seasons of the year." On treating of vegetation in Spring, I said 'Shall we on this occasion forget the ploughman, 'who whistles o'er the furrow'd land, an' toils for us the lee lang day,' to supply us not only with the conveniences, but even the necessaries of life, without which we could not exist? The man who makes two blades of grass to grow, where only one grew before, deserves far better of the world than either an Alexander, a Charles the Twelfth, a Nelson, a Blucher, or a Wellington; whose employments have been to diminish the numbers of the human race, and for which they have been covered with glory, and adored as demi-gods, while the Husbandman has been considered as a poor Insignificant Clown". So Sir, you see that you are placed in the same predicament, for you adore Nelson, Blucher, and Wellington as demi-gods.

Block. No, I do not, I consider them only as men like myself. But men whose love of their country (illegible text)red their bosoms to heroic actions. If such men had not arisen our Tight Little Island would have been totally ruined. Buonaparte, that base usurper of the Crown of France, would have deprived us of our existence as a Nation, and reduced us to the situation of abject slaves.