This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
COPYRIGHT
215


infringements have been committed in relation to the stored copy; or
(iii) the NSP is served with a take-down notice that purports to be given by or on behalf of the rights owner of the stored copy,
the NSP expeditiously takes reasonable steps to remove or disable access to the stored copy;
(c) the NSP has—
(i) designated a representative to receive take-down notices under paragraph (b)(iii); and
(ii) published, in the prescribed manner, the prescribed information about the designated representative; and
(d) any condition as may be prescribed.

(3) In deciding whether a financial benefit is directly attributable to a rights infringement for the purposes of subsection (2)(a), all relevant matters must be considered, including—

(a) industry practice in relation to the charging for services by NSPs; and
(b) whether the financial benefit is greater than the benefit that would usually result from charging in accordance with accepted industry practices.

(4) In deciding whether a NSP knows about the matters in subsection (2)(b)(i) or (ii), the following notices must be ignored:

(a) a notice that purports to be given by or on behalf of the rights owner of the stored copy (other than a take-down notice under subsection (2)(b)(iii));
(b) a notice by the rights owner of the stored copy under section 326(2)(b) (intention to apply for access disabling order).