on whether the work is published or unpublished (even if the work may be downloaded or printed from the site), because the copyright owner did not authorize the work's availability on the website in the first instance.
• Implied license: If a work is posted on a website and there is no evident statement in the terms of service for the site, on the webpage where the work is displayed, or elsewhere stating that the work may be downloaded, copied, forwarded, and/or printed it may be unclear whether the copyright owner authorized the distribution of that work. If downloading, reproducing, or retransmitting is facilitated in some manner by the website, there may or may not be an implied license to distribute the work, in which case the work may or may not be considered published.
• Work made available in electronic and hard copy format. If the same work is posted online and distributed in tangible copies, such as CDs, DVDs, or in printed formats, the work will be deemed published, even if it has not been published online.
For complete certainly, authors or copyright owners may register website content as an unpublished work before it is distributed or placed online. Likewise, if a website has not been posted online yet and if all of the content contained in the site has never been distributed, the website may be registered as an unpublished work. A registration for an unpublished work secures the statutory benefits for a work, such as the availability of statutory damages and attorney's fees for infringements that occur after the effective date of the registration for that work (regardless of whether the work is subsequently published).
1008.4 Identifying the Work(s) That May Be Included in the Claim
To register a claim with the U.S. Copyright Office the applicant should begin by identifying the work(s) of authorship that will be included in the claim. This is especially critical for websites, because they typically contain a number of discrete works of authorship. Each work may present unique registration issues that the applicant may need to consider when preparing the application and the deposit material.
For example, if the website contains a number of works that are owned by different parties, it may be necessary to submit a separate application for each work. Separate applications may be necessary if the applicant determines that the works have been published and that each work was published on a different date. Likewise, separate applications may be necessary if the applicant intends to register multiple versions of the same work and if the applicant determines that the versions were published on successive dates. Indeed, every work that is added to a website potentially may qualify as a derivative work or a new contribution to a collective work. In such cases, a separate application and separate publication date may be required for each date that new content was uploaded to the website and authorized for distribution to the public.
By contrast, if the website qualifies as a collective work it may be possible to register the entire site with one application, provided that the claimant owns the copyright in the site as a whole. It also may be possible to register the entire site together with the component works contained therein if the claimant is the author of or owns the copyright in those works. However, it is important to note that a website claimed as a
Chapter 1000 : 24
12/22/2014
