establishments and endowments. And we see Liberal statesmen, for whose purpose this antipathy happens to be convenient, flattering it all they can; saying that though they have no intention of laying hands on an Establishment which is efficient and popular, like the Anglican Establishment here in England, yet it is in the abstract a fine and good thing that religion should be left to the voluntary support of its promoters, and should thus gain in energy and independence; and Mr. Gladstone has no words strong enough to express his admiration of the refusal of State-aid by the Irish Roman Catholics, who have never yet been seriously asked to accept it, but who would a good deal embarrass him if they demanded it. And we see philosophical politicians with a turn for swimming with the stream, and philosophical divines with the same turn, seeking to give a sort of grand stamp of generality and solemnity to this antipathy of the Nonconformists, and to dress it out as a law of human progress in the future. Now, nothing can be pleasanter than swimming with the stream; and we might gladly, if we could, try in our unsystematic way to take part in labours at once so philosophical and so popular. But we have got fixed in our minds that a more full and harmonious development of
Page:Culture and Anarchy, Third edition, 1882, Matthew Arnold.djvu/19
PREFACE.
xv
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a2/Culture_and_Anarchy%2C_Third_edition%2C_1882%2C_Matthew_Arnold.djvu/page19-1024px-Culture_and_Anarchy%2C_Third_edition%2C_1882%2C_Matthew_Arnold.djvu.jpg)