collective children of God do, our grand centre of life, our city which we have builded for us to dwell in, is London! London, with its unutterable external hideousness, and with its internal canker of publicè egestas, privatim opulentia,—to use the words which Sallust puts into Cato's mouth about Rome,—unequalled in the world! The word, again, which we children of God speak, the voice which most hits our collective thought, the newspaper with the largest circulation in England, nay, with the largest circulation in the whole world, is the Daily Telegraph! I say that when our religious organisations,—which I admit to express the most considerable effort after perfection that our race has yet made,—land us in no better result than this, it is high time to examine carefully their idea of perfection, to see whether it does not leave out of account sides and forces of human nature which we might turn to great use; whether it would not be more operative if it were more complete. And I say that the English reliance on our religious organisations and on their ideas of human perfection just as they stand, is like our reliance on freedom, on muscular Christianity, on population, on coal, on wealth,—mere belief in machinery, and unfruitful; and that it is wholesomely counteracted by culture, bent on seeing things as they are, and on draw-
Page:Culture and Anarchy, Third edition, 1882, Matthew Arnold.djvu/85
SWEETNESS AND LIGHT.
29
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a2/Culture_and_Anarchy%2C_Third_edition%2C_1882%2C_Matthew_Arnold.djvu/page85-1024px-Culture_and_Anarchy%2C_Third_edition%2C_1882%2C_Matthew_Arnold.djvu.jpg)