Page:Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1827) Vol 2.djvu/230

This page needs to be proofread.
180
THE DECLINE AND FALL

CHAP. XVI.

dom, a great number of Phrygians with their wives and children[1].

Subsequent edicts. Some slight disturbances, though they were suppressed almost as soon as excited, in Syria and the frontiers of Armenia, afforded the enemies of the church a very plausible occasion to insinuate, that those troubles had been secretly fomented by the intrigues of the bishops, who had already forgotten their ostentatious professions of passive and unlimited obedience[2]. The resentment, or the fears of Diocletian, at length transported him beyond the bounds of moderation, which he had hitherto preserved; and he declared, in a series of cruel edicts, his intention of abolishing the christian name. By the first of these edicts, the governors of the provinces were directed to apprehend all persons of the ecclesiastical order; and the prisons, destined for the vilest criminals, were soon filled with a multitude of bishops, presbyters, deacons, readers, and exorcists. By a second edict, the magistrates were commanded to employ every method of severity which might reclaim them from their odious superstition, and oblige them to return to the established worship of the gods. This rigorous order was extended, by a subsequent edict, to the whole body of christians, who were exposed to a violent and general persecution[3] Instead of those salutary re-

  1. Lactantius (Institut. Divin. v. 11.) confines the calamity to the conventiculum, with its congregation. Eusebius (viii. 11.) extends it to a whole city, and introduces something very like a regular siege. His ancient Latin translator, Ilufinus, adds the important circumstance of the permission given to the inhabitants of retiring from thence. As Phrygia reached to the confines of Isauria, it is possible that the restless temper of those independent barbarians may have contributed to this misfortune.
  2. Eusebius, 1. viii. c. 6. M. de Valois, with some probability, thinks that he has discovered the Syrian rebellion in an oration of Libanius; and that it was a rash attempt of the tribune Eugenius, who with only five hundred men seized Antioch, and might perhaps allure the christians by the piomise of religious toleration. From Eusebius, (1. ix. c. 8.) as well as from Moses of Chorene, (Hist. Arnien. 1. ii. c. 77, etc.) it may be inferred that Christianity was already introduced into Armenia.
  3. See Mosheim, p. 938. The text of Eusebius very plainly shows, that the governors, whose powers were enlarged, not restrained, by the new laws, could punish with death the most obstinate christians, as an example to their brethren.