Page:Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire vol 1 (1897).djvu/335

This page has been validated.
OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE
261

Greeks and half-civilized barbarians. It subsisted as an independent state from the time of the Peloponnesian war,[1] was at last swallowed up by the ambition of Mithridates,[2] and, with the rest of his dominions, sunk under the weight of the Roman arms. From the reign of Augustus,[3] the kings of Bosphorus were the humble, but not useless, allies of the empire. By presents, by arms, and by a slight fortification drawn across the isthmus, they effectually guarded against the roving plunderers of Sarmatia the access of a country which, from its peculiar situation and convenient harbours, commanded the Euxine Sea and Asia Minor.[4] As long as the sceptre was possessed by a lineal succession of kings, they acquitted themselves of their important charge with vigilance and success. Domestic factions, and the fears or private interest of obscure usurpers who seized on the vacant throne, admitted the Goths into the heart of Bosphorus. With the acquisition of a superfluous waste of fertile soil, the conquerors obtained the command of a naval force who acquire a naval forcesufficient to transport their armies to the coast of Asia.[5] The ships used in the navigation of the Euxine were of a very singular construction. They were slight flat-bottomed barks framed of timber only, without the least mixture of iron, and occasionally covered with a shelving roof on the appearance of a tempest.[6] In these floating houses the Goths carelessly trusted themselves to the mercy of an unknown sea, under the conduct of sailors pressed into the service, and whose skill and fidelity were equally suspicious. But the hopes of plunder had banished every idea of danger, and a natural fearlessness of temper supplied in their minds the more rational confidence which is the just result of knowledge and experience. Warriors of such a daring spirit must have often murmured against the cowardice of their guides, who required the strongest assurances of a settled calm before they would venture to embark, and would scarcely ever be tempted to lose sight of the land. Such, at least, is the

  1. Strabo, l. vii. p. 309. The first kings of Bosphorus were the allies of Athens.
  2. Appian in Mithridat. [67].
  3. It was reduced by the arms of Agrippa. Orosius, vi. ax. Eutropius, vii. 9. The Romans once advanced within three days' march of the Tanais. Tacit. Annal. xii. 17.
  4. See the Toxaris ot Lucian, if we credit the sincerity and the virtues of the Scythian, who relates a great war of his nation against the kings of Bosphorus.
  5. Zosimus, l. i. p. 28 [31. Coins prove that the lineal succession did not cease before 267 at the earliest.]
  6. Strabo, l. xi. [p. 495]. Tacit. Hist. iii. 47. They were called Camaræ.