Page:Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire vol 1 (1897).djvu/430

This page has been validated.
356
THE DECLINE AND FALL

exercised over his slaves. [1] The greatest part of the nation was gradually reduced into a state of servitude; compelled to perpetual labour on the estates of the Gallic nobles, and confined to the soil, either by the real weight of fetters, or by the no less cruel and forcible restraints of the laws. During the long series of troubles which agitated Gaul, from the reign of Gallienus to that of Diocletian, the condition of these servile peasants was peculiarly miserable; and they experienced at once the complicated tyranny of their masters, of the barbarians, of the soldiers, and of the officers of the revenue. [2]

Their rebellion Their patience was at last provoked into despair. On every side they rose in multitudes, armed with rustic weapons, and with irresistible fury. The ploughman became a foot-soldier, the shepherd mounted on horseback, the deserted villages and open towns were abandoned to the flames, and the ravages of the peasants equalled those of the fiercest barbarians. [3] They asserted the natural rights of men, but they asserted those rights with the most savage cruelty. The Gallic nobles, justly dreading their revenge, either took refuge in the fortified cities, or fled from the wild scene of anarchy. The peasants reigned without control; and two of their most daring leaders had the folly and rashness to assume the Imperial ornaments. [4] Their power soon expired at the approach of the legions. The strength of union and discipline obtained an easy victory over a licentious and chastisement and divided multitude. [5] A severe retaliation was inflicted on the peasants who were found in arms; the affrighted remnant returned to their respective habitations, and their unsuccessful effort for freedom served only to confirm their slavery. So strong and uniform is the current of popular passions that we might almost venture, from very scanty materials, to relate the particulars of this war; but we are not disposed to believe that the principal leaders Ælianus and Amandus were Christians, [6] or to insinuate that the rebellion, as it happened in the time of Luther,

  1. Cæsar de Bell. Gallic, vi. 13. Orgetorix, the Helvetian, could arm for his defence a body of ten thousand slaves.
  2. Their oppression and misery are acknowledged by Eumenius (Panegyr. vi 8). Gallias efferatas injuriis.
  3. Panegyr. Vet. ii. 4. Aurelius Victor [Cses. 39].
  4. Ælianus and Amandus. We have medals coined by them. Goltzius in Thes. R. A. p. 117, 121. [See Eckhel, 8, 41, but they are condemned as spurious by Cohen.]
  5. Levibus præliis domuit. Eutrop. ix. 20.
  6. The fact rests indeed on very slight authority, a life of St. Babolinus, which is probably of the seventh century. See Duchesne Scriptores Rer. Francicar. torn. i. p. 662.