This page has been validated.
Chap. XIII.
Vocal Music.
371

though they never sing, and do not naturally modulate their voices to any great extent. Hunter asserts[1] that with the true songsters the muscles of the larynx are stronger in the males than in the females; but with this slight exception there is no difference in the vocal organs of the two sexes, although the males of most species sing so much better and more continuously than the females.

It is remarkable that only small birds properly sing. The Australian genus Menura, however, must be excepted; for the Menura Alberti, which is about the size of a half-grown turkey, not only mocks other birds, but "its own whistle is exceedingly beautiful and varied." The males congregate and form "corroboying places," where they sing, raising and spreading their tails like peacocks, and drooping their wings.[2] It is also remarkable that birds which sing well are rarely decorated with brilliant colours or other ornaments. Of our British birds, excepting the bullfinch and goldfinch, the best songsters are plain-coloured. The kingfisher, bee-eater, roller, hoopoe, woodpeckers, &c., utter harsh cries; and the brilliant birds of the tropics are hardly ever songsters.[3] Hence bright colours and the power of song seem to replace each other. We can perceive that if the plumage did not vary in brightness, or if bright colours were dangerous to the species, other means would be employed to charm the females; and melody of voice offers one such means.

In some birds the vocal organs differ greatly in the two sexes. In the Tetrao cupido (fig. 39) the male has two bare, orange-coloured sacks, one on each side of the neck; and these are largely inflated when the male, during the breeding-season, makes his curious hollow sound, audible at a great distance. Audubon proved that the sound was intimately connected with this apparatus (which reminds us of the air-sacks on each side of the mouth of certain male frogs), for he found that the sound was much diminished when one of the sacks of a tame bird was pricked, and when both were pricked it was altogether stopped. The female has "a somewhat similar, though smaller naked space of skin on the neck; but this is not capable of inflation."[4] The

  1. As stated by Barrington in 'Philosoph. Transact.' 1773, p. 262.
  2. Gould, 'Handbook to the Birds of Australia,' vol. i. 1865, pp. 308–310 See also Mr. T. W. Wood in the 'Student,' April 1870, p. 125.
  3. See remarks to this effect in Gould's 'Introduction to the Trochilidæ' 1861, p. 22.
  4. 'The Sportsman and Naturalist in Canada,' by Major W. Ross King, 1866 pp. 144–146. Mr. T W. Wood gives in the 'Student' (April, 1870 p. 116) an excellent account of the attitude and habits of this bird during its courtship. He states that the ear-tufts or neck-plumes are erected, so that they meet over the crown of the head. See his drawing, fig. 39.