Page:Destruction of the Greek Empire.djvu/155

CHUEGH COUNCIL ON UNION : BALE 121 attacks upon the empire from the West. So far all looked promising. Unfortunately, however, at this time the Latin Church itself was divided. Kival popes, one in Italy, the other at Avignon, had denounced each other as pretenders. A Council of the Church opened at Bale in March 1431 was by a papal Bull ordered to be transferred to Bologna after the expiry of eight months. The principal reason assigned for the transfer was the greater convenience of John and the imperial party. Eugenius had taken this step without consultation with the cardinals, and the change of place was at once strenuously opposed. A majority of the Council refused to obey and replied that as the Bohemians, the followers of John Huss, had been formally cited to appear at Bale, the place of meeting could not be changed. As to the convenience of the representatives of the Greek Church, 'the peace of Germany is not to be sacrificed for the old song which has rung in the ears of Europe for three centuries and ended in nothing, the reconciliation of the Greek and Eatin Churches.' 1 The Council was supported in its opposition to Eugenius by the Emperor Sigismund, by the duke of Milan, and by many kings, princes, bishops, universities, and cities. Only four cardinals remained on his side. Nevertheless he fearlessly denounced the Council as a Synagogue of Satan. Eor a while the more he threatened the more the digni- taries of the Church flocked to Bale. Eugenius in vain endeavoured to extort from the Emperor Sigismund the dissolution of the Council as the price of his consent to place the imperial crown on his head. Sigismund would not yield, and Eugenius had to crown him. With the exception of Venice and Florence, all Western Europe was against Eugenius. An insurrection in Borne forced him to leave the city, and he escaped in a mean disguise. He was driven for a while to withdraw his denunciations and to admit the legality of the Council and of its acts. A temporary reconciliation was of short duration. The claims of the rival parties were incapable of reconciliation. 1 Milman, History of Latin Christianity, 3rd edition, vol. viii. p. 348.