the " Euporista ad Eunapium," and the nineteen books of the " Collecta Medicinalia " that were then discovered (including the two treatises " De Laqueis " and " De Machinamentis "), and pub- lished them together, with the title " Oribasii quae restant Omnia," Basil. 1557, 3 vols. 8vo. They are also to be found in H. Stephani " Medicae Artis Principes," Paris, 1567, fol. The pieces en- titled " De Victus Ratione, per quodlibet Anni Tempus" (Basil. 152(5, fol.) and " De Simplici- bus" (Argent. 1533, fol.) are probably extracted from his larger works.
Oribasius is said by Suidas to have been the
author of some other works which are now lost,
viz. 1. (
Greek characters), De Regno ; 2. (Greek characters),
(Greek characters); and (Greek characters), Ad illos quilms Medicorum Copia non datur (or perhaps rather Ad Medicos dubitantes, vel inopes Consilii), which last has been conjectured to have been the same work as the "Euporista ad Eunapium," mentioned above.
Besides these works, a commentary on the Aphorisms of Hippocrates goes under the name of Oribasius, but is undoubtedly spurious. It was first published in Latin by J. Guinterius Ander- nacus, Paris, 1533, 8vo., and has been thrice re- printed. It is probable that the work does not exist in Greek, and that it was written by a person who made use of a Latin translation of the "Syn- opsis ad Eustathium," and who composed it with the intention of passing it off as the genuine work of Oribasius. If so, it is a clumsy forgery, and betrays its spurious origin to the most cursory in- spector, being apparently the work of a Christian, and at the same time purporting to be written at the command of Ptolemy Euergetes. It has been conjectured that it was composed by some physi- cian belonging to the school of Salerno, about the beginning of the fourteenth century ; but this is certainly too recent, as it is to be found in two MSS. at Paris, which are supposed to belong to the tenth century. (See Littré's Hippocrates, vol. iv. p. 443.)
A further account of Oribasius, especially of his medical opinions, may be found in Freind's Hist, of Physic, vol. i.; Haller's Biblioth. Anat, Bihlioth. Chirurg., Biblioth. Botan., and Biblioth. Medic. Pract.; Sprengel's Hist, de la Méd.; and in J. F. C. Hecker's Litterar. Annal. der gesammten Heilkunde, 1825, vol. i., which last work the writer has never seen. See also Fabric. Biblioth. Gr. vol. ix. p. 451, xii. 640, xiii. 353, ed. vet. ; and Choulant, Handb. der Bücherkunde fu{{subst::}}r die Aeltere Medicin.
[W. A. G.]
ORI'GENES ((Greek characters)) one of the most
eminent of the early Christian writers, not only for
his intellectual powers and attainments, but also
for the influence exercised by him on the opinions
of subsequent ages, and for the dissensions and
discussions respecting his opinions, which have
been carried on through many centuries down to
modern times.
I. Life. Origen bore, apparently from his birth
(Euseb. H.E. vi. 14) the additional name of Adamantius ((Greek characters)), though Epiphanius states
(Haeres. lxiv. 73) that he assumed it himself.
Doubtless, the name was regarded by the admirers
of Origen as significant either of his unwearied
industry (Hieron. Ep. xliii. ad Marcellam, c. 1.
vol. i. p. 190 ed Vallars.), or of the irrefragable
strength of his arguments (Phot. Bibl. cod. 118);
but these obviously laudatory interpretations of it
render it improbable that Origen assumed it himself, as a boastful temper does not appear to have
been at all characteristic of him. The names
"Chalcenterus" (Greek characters) ("brasen-bowels ")
given him by Jerome (l. c), and "Chalceutes "
(Greek characters) ("brasier"), and "Syntactes" (Greek characters) ("Composer") conferred upon him by
others (Epiph. Haeres. lxiii. 1 ; and Tillemont.
Mém. vol. iii. p. 497), appear to have been mere
epithets, expressive of his assiduity. As he was
in his seventeenth year, at the time of his father's
death, which occurred apparently in April 203
(Huet. Origenian. i. 8), in the persecution which
began in the tenth year of the reign of the
Emperor Severus, his birth must be fixed in or
about A.D. 186. The year 187, given in the
Chronicon Paschale, is too late ; and 185, given
by most modern writers, too early. His father
was Leonides ((Greek characters)), a devout Christian of
Alexandria. Suidas (s. v. (Greek characters)) calls him
"bishop;" but his authority, unsupported by any
ancient testimony, is insufficient to prove his episcopal character. Porphyry (apud Euseb. H. E.
vi. 19) speaks of Origen, with whom he claimed
to have been acquainted in early life, as having
been educated a heathen, and afterwards converted
to Christianity; but, as his acquaintance with Origen
was apparently very slight, and when Origen was an
old man, his authority in such a matter is of little
weight. Leonides gave his son a careful education,
not only in the usual branches of knowledge, but
especially in the Scriptures, of which he made him
commit to memory and recite a portion every day.
Origen was a pupil of Clement of Alexandria, and he also received some instruction of Pantaenus apparently after his return from India. [Pantaenus.] He had Alexander, afterwards bishop of Jerusalem, for his early friend and fellow-student (Alex. ap. Euseb. H. E. vi. 14).
In the persecution which commenced in the
tenth year of Severus (A.D. 202) Leonides was
imprisoned, and after a time beheaded. Origen
was anxious to share with his father the glory of
martyrdom; and when this desire was frustrated
by the watchfulness of his mother, who, after
vainly entreating him to give up his purpose, hid
away all his clothes, and so prevented him from
leaving home, he wrote a letter to his father,
exhorting him to steadfastness, in the words " See
that thou changest not thy mind for our sakes."
By the death of Leonides, his widow, with Origen
and six younger sons, was reduced to destitution,
the property of the martyr having been confiscated.
Origen was, however, received into the house of a
wealthy female, then living at Alexandria, who had,
among her inmates at the time, one Paul of Antioch,
whom she regarded as a son, who was in bad
repute on account of his heretical opinions. Neander calls him a Gnostic. His eloquence, however,
attracted a considerable audience, not only of those
who sympathised in his views, but of the orthodox;
yet Origen refused to unite in prayer with him,
"detesting," as he has somewhere expressed it,
"heretical teachings." (Euseb. H. E. vi. 2.) This
repugnance probably quickened his efforts to become independent, and his ardent application to
study enabled him soon to extricate himself from
difficulty by becoming a teacher of the branches of
education comprehended under the epithet "grammatical " ((Greek characters)). (Euseb. ibid.) His
