Page:Dictionary of National Biography. Errata (1904).djvu/143

This page needs to be proofread.




N.B. /.e. stands for from end and LI. for last line Page Col. Line

5 ii 14 f.e. ^

6 i 3 3 ' C ' f Garnett > Jolm : / or Lynam read Burdy


13 ii 14 f.e. Garraway, Sir Henry: for when Garraway read It is commonly stated in error

that then Garraway 9 f.e. after acclamation, insert Garraway's alleged speech was a tract written by

Hyde for publication. 7 f.e. for On his way home he read The writer of the published oration fancifully

asserted that Garraway on his way home

14 ii 44-45 Garrett, Jeremiah L. : for Christ's College read Christ's Hospital 30 i 3 f.e. Garter, Bernard : for Braystocke read Brigstocke

35 i 15 Gascoigne, Sir Bernard : for 17 Oct. read 24 Sept.

16-17 for thirty-one years at the rent of 207. read forty-four years at the rent of 20Z.

(Sloane MS. 856, f. 8).

ii 31 for Innsbruck read Austria

38 it 26 Gascoigne, George : for Gaston read Gascoigne (not Gaston, as printed in the

Calendar) 28-32 for But the identity of Gaston .... librarians assigned to Gascoigne read

There is little doubt that Gascoigne was the author of

23-19 for All the best evidence .... in pious exercises, read The ' Spoyle ' was re-

f.e. printed in Mr. Arber's ' English Garner,' vol. viii.

44 i 21 Gascoigne, Sir Thomas : for (1596 ? read (1598 ?

22 for 1596 read 1593

46 ii 39 Gascoigne, Sir William : for Harwood read Harewood

50 ii 16 Gaskell, Elizabeth C. : for her life read her married life

51 ii 8 for 1865, &c.) read in ' Household Words,' 1855, &c.)

10 for both 1865. read both of which appeared in ' Household Words,' the first

in 1853 and the second in 1855. 56 ii 27 Gassiot, John P. : for he endowed read he helped to endow

15 f.e. after Gassiot insert who was elected a fellow of the society,

62 i 39 Gataker, Thomas : for Goulson read Goulston

83 i 15 Gawler, George : after rank of colonel, insert In 1833 he contributed to ' The United Service Journal,' part ii., a paper called ' The Crisis and Close of the Action at Waterloo, by an Eye-witness,' which was reissued as a pamphlet (Dublin, 1833) and caused great controversy. Gawler contended that his own regiment (the 52nd), supported by the rest of Adams's brigade, and not the guards, defeated Napoleon's final attack. Gawler defended his contention against Sir Hussey Vivian in ' The United Service Journal ' for 1833, and was corroborated by W. Leeke in his ' Lord Seaton's Regiment at Waterloo,' 1866.