House (Luttrell, Hist. Relation of State Affairs, i. 482). Dodd says that he was equal in learning to his Anglican opponents, ‘but much superior to them in his modest behaviour, which gained him great applause, even from those of the adverse party’ (Church Hist. iii. 470).
He was author of: 1. ‘Catholicks no Idolaters; or a full Refutation of Dr. Stillingfleet's Unjust Charge of Idolatry against the Church of Rome,’ London, 1671 and 1672, 8vo. This was in reply to ‘A Discourse of the Idolatry practis'd in the Church of Rome,’ 1671, by Stillingfleet. 2. ‘A Just Discharge to Dr. Stillingfleet's Unjust Charge of Idolatry against the Church of Rome. With a Discovery of the Vanity of his late Defence. … By way of Dialogue between Eunomius, a Conformist, and Catharinus, a Non-conformist,’ 3 pts., Paris, 1677, 12mo. Stillingfleet replied with ‘Several Conferences between a Romish Priest, a Fanatic Chaplain, and a Divine of the Church of England, …’ 1679. 3. A Treatise concerning the Oath of Supremacy. Manuscript (Memoirs of Gregorio Panzani, p. 326). 4. ‘A Sermon of St. Peter, preached before the Queen Dowager … on 29 June 1686,’ London, 1686, 4to, reprinted in ‘Catholick Sermons,’ 1741. The publication of this sermon gave rise to a controversy on the questions of St. Peter's residence at Rome and the pope's supremacy. 5. ‘A Sermon of the Nativity of our Lord, preached before the Queen Dowager … at Somerset House,’ London, 1686, 8vo.
[Addit. MS. 5870, f. 99; Baker's Hist. of St. John's (Mayor), i. 525, 526; Cath. Mag. v. 621, vi. 59; Cooke's Preacher's Assistant, ii. 141; Dodd's Certamen Utriusque Ecclesiæ, p. 16; Gillow's Bibl. Dict. ii. 503, iii. 307; Jones's Popery Tracts, pp. 126, 127, 257, 423, 453, 466, 483; Luttrell's Hist. Relation of State Affairs. i. 391; Mayor's Admissions to St. John's Coll. p. 48; Panzani's Memoirs, p. 338; Tablet, 16 Feb. 1889, p. 257; Wood's Athenæ Oxon. (Bliss), iv. 93, 674.]
GODEL, WILLIAM (fl. 1173), historian, is only known from the allusions in his chronicle, in which he never mentions himself by name. Under the year 1145 he says: ‘This year I, who compiled this work from various histories, entered a monastery; in age a youth, and by race an Englishman.’ But at the end of the manuscript (Bibliothèque Nationale, 4893, sec. xiii) there is a note in a hand of the fourteenth century, stating that the author was William Godel, a monk of St. Martial at Limoges. The writer, however, never mentions St. Martial, nor even the town of Limoges. Probably he was a Cistercian of some monastery in the diocese of Sens, or of Bourges; for at the date of the foundation of Citeaux he gives very exactly the succession of its abbots, and under the year 1145 he reports the death of Henri Sanglier, archbishop of Sens, who was succeeded by Hugues of Touci, from whom he received all the orders except the priesthood. He was ordained priest of Leuroux by Pierre de la Châtre, archbishop of Bourges, who died in 1171. Godel seems to have been fond of travel, and so perhaps often changed his monastery till, dying at St. Martial, he left his chronicle there. The chronicle is a history from the creation to 1173 A.D., with some additions by a later writer down to 1320. It must have been written before 1180, for under date 1137 he speaks of Louis VII as ‘qui nunc rex pius superest,’ and later he refers to Philip Augustus as ‘qui nunc regni coronam expectat.’ The chronicle is very brief till 1066, then rather fuller on English affairs, but contains little that is new or important, and has some gross errors. Godel used as his English authorities Geoffrey of Monmouth, Bede, William of Malmesbury, Henry of Huntingdon (from whose work to the accession of Henry I he had made extracts in a monastery in England), and Florence of Worcester. This chronicle closely resembles the anonymous continuation from 1124 to 1184 of the ‘Chronicle of S. Pierre de Sens’ by Clarius, with which it is in many places literally identical. The writers of the ‘Histoire Littéraire’ hold that it was the continuator who had borrowed, while the editors of the ‘Recueil’ incline to the belief that Godel was himself the continuator. This is additional reason for believing that Godel's original monastery was in the diocese of Sens. Almost all Godel's chronicle from the tenth century to 1173 is printed in the ‘Recueil des Historiens de la France,’ x. 259–63, xi. 282–285, and xiii. 671–7, where also extracts from the continuation of Clarius will be found, xii. 283–5.
[Histoire Littéraire de la France, xiii. 508; Hardy's Cat. of Brit. Hist. ii. 402–3; notes in Recueil as above, and pref. to vol. xiii. p. lxviii.
GODERICH, Viscount. [See Robinson, Frederick John, Earl of Ripon, 1782–1859.]
GODFREY of Malmesbury (fl. 1081) is supposed author of a chronicle in the British Museum (MS. Cott. Vesp. D. iv. 73). Bishop Tanner erroneously identified this writer with Godfrey, abbot of Malmesbury in the eleventh century. Godfrey the abbot was a native of Jumièges, who accompanied his townsman, Theodewin, when he was made abbot of Ely in 1071. Two years and a
