Page:Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr.pdf/35

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 35 of 58

their requirements. By way of illustration, it is stated, the RSO at Hyderabad
All the three special leave petitions namely S.L.P. (Civil) No. 19279 of 1995, S.L.P. (Civil ) No. 20137 of 1995 and S.L.P. (Civil ) No. 19796 of 1995 are directed against common judgment dated 9.5.1995
2. All the three special leave petititions namely SLP (Civil) No. 19729 of 1995, SLP (Civil ) No. 20137 of 1995 and SLP (Civil ) No. 19796 of 1995 are directed against common judgment dated 9-5-1995

* The changes have been underlined.

27. Giving full forms of abbreviations to enhance readability and clarity.

Raw text obtained from Registry:

SCC Page:

from legal consequences and therefore, they are also guilty of the offence u/s 201 IPC.
from legal consequences and therefore, they are also guilty of the offence under Section 201 IPC.”

* The changes have been underlined.

In addition to the above, capitalization and italicization is made wherever necessary in the raw text; and punctuation, articles, spellings and compound words are also checked and corrected, if required, in the original text.

8. The copyright protection finds its justification in fair play. When a person produces something with his skill and labour, it normally belongs to him and the other person would not be permitted to make a profit out of the skill and labour of the original author and it is for this reason the Copyright Act, 1957 gives to the authors certain exclusive rights in relation to the certain work referred in the Act. The object of the Act is to protect the author of the copyright work from an unlawful reproduction or exploitation of his work by others. Copyright is a right