quiet, and to submit to decrees which they cannot alter.”
In reference to the choice of officers, she strongly insists that all officers—superior and inferior—shall be females. She prefers a widow for the post of matron, because of her superior knowledge of the world and of life; and never should she or her subordinates be chosen “because the situation is suited to their wants, but because they are suited to fill the situation.” She holds it of the first importance that the matrons should not only be of a superior station in life, but that they should be decidedly religious. This little book was written in 1827, but from her insistance upon this as a first requisite in proper dealing with female prisoners, it appears likely that the then recent Act of Geo. IV. had not been commonly complied with. This Act provides that a “matron shall be appointed in every prison in which female prisoners shall be confined, who shall reside in the prison; and it shall be the duty of the matron constantly to superintend the female prisoners.” Again, another clause of the Act says, “Females shall in all cases be attended by female officers.” That these provisions had only been partially carried out, is proved by her words relative to this clause: “Since the passing of the late Act of Parliament for the regulations of prisons, our large gaols have been generally provided with a matron and female turnkeys; but it is much to be regretted that in many smaller prisons no such provisions have yet been adopted. Nor ought it to be concealed that the persons selected to fill the office of matron are, in various instances, unsuited to their posts; and in other cases are unfitted for its fulfilment, by residing out of the prison.”
