most promising stuff: and with the help of old diaries would make a long and
interesting paper.
I’m getting concerned about the way the initials “F.R.G.S.” are being
commercialised. You’ve only to look through the advertisements of people running
cruises, winter sports parties, hired safaris for C. African Shikhar, (and all the other
ways in which people who are not competent to, spend good money on voluntary
travel) to find how many of the promotions show F.R.G.S. after their names, as a
bait. Ever since Curzon's megalomania of expansion with Kensington Gore, his
council have had to go body(?) snatching for new members: and this
commercialisation of the membership
IMG 0334
qualification is a direct result. Some years ago I put it up to the council that the list
should be divided into “A.R.G.S.” (associates) whose fees would come in, as they do
now, often from people who have never seen the white side of Dover Cliffs, and who
certainly have never been a mile from a cooked dinner in all their lives – and the
“F.R.G.S.” (fellows), whose qualifications would be scrutinised by the council in
terms such as those which you and I know. The latter might be trusted (as doctors,
indeed, are compelled) not to use the qualification for rewarding or commercial ends.
The final result would be an enhancement of the “izzat” of the whole show: especially
if the “A”’s were told that they could be promoted to “F” for subsequent active work
done: and, as for the change being a loss to the society, one would foreseeably
expect a larger number of
IMG_0335
candidates.
I got a very courteous letter back, saying that the Council didn’t see their way to
risking the loss of fees in making the change. They were quite frank about the fact
that fees, alone, were the obstacle. So I dropped it.
But if you – as you probably will be – are re-elected to the Council when you
return, do you think you could keep this suggestion up your sleeve for a second
chance of presenting it? What I’m so afraid of is that if the present state of affairs
goes on, some almighty slump may suddenly take place, and fellows withdraw their
names wholesale. Whereupon, it would be a case of Humpty Dumpty, the thing
would be irreparable.
Do let me have a line sometimes about your new surroundings: and please accept
my assurance, that nothing you tell me, directly or indirectly, will ever be printed or
published.
- Yours sincerely.
- L. Bethell
- L. Bethell
- Yours sincerely.
====================================================================
Letter 4, 10th May 1930
