Page:Federal Reporter, 1st Series, Volume 10.djvu/3

CASES REPORTED. ���Page AdamsT. Meyroae 671 �Adams, Hoatetter v 838 �Alabama, The 394 �Alden, Star Sait Caster Co. ▼ 555 �Aldrich v. Crouch 305 �Allen & Co. v. Thompson 116 �American Grape Bugar Co., New �York (Jrape Sugar Co. v 835 �American Oleograph Co., Kerting v. 17 �Andersen V. ShaSer 266 �Ant, The 294 �Apgarv. Christophers 857 �Arthur, White v 80 �Artt, Osgood V 365 �Atchison, T. & S. Fe R. Ce, Dins- , �more v 210 �Atlantic & O. E. Co. , Karns v 309 �Atwood V. The Portland Co 283 �Baltz, New Process Fermentation �Co. V 289 �Baltzer, BiachofiEsclicim v 1 �Barber v. Hallett 130 �Bartow, United States v 873, 874 �Batesv. United States 92 �Bellew, Hubbard V 849 �Benedict v. Williams 208 �Bigelow Carpet Co. v. Dobson 385 �Bischofischeim ▼. Baltzer 1 �Blue Bonnet, The 150 �Boyd V. Bradish 406 �Boynton Bros., In re 277 �Boynton, Jesse, In re 277 �Bo3mton, Lyman, In re 277 �Bookwalter v. Clark 793 �Boone v. lowa & Minn. Const. Co.. 401 �Bradish, Boyd y 406 �Brettv. Quintard 741 �Bruce v. Marder 7.';o �Buerk v. Imhaeuser H08 �Buford & Co. V. Strother & Conklin. 406 �Buntin, United States v 730 �Burgess v. Qrailam 216 ���Campbell, United States v 816 ���Psg* �Carao V. Galmaraes.. 783 �Cargo of Malt, A 774 �Carrier v. Town of Shawangunk .... 220 �Cary, In re 622 �Case v.Small 722 �Cavender v. Cavender 828 �Cavender, Cavender y. 828 �Celluloid Manuf 'g Co. , Spill v 290 �Centennial, The 397 �Central Nat. Bank, United States y. 612 Chicago, M. & St. P. R. R., Greg- �oryv ..629 �Chicago, M. <fc St. P. R. R.,Harrisv. 629 Chicago, M. & St. P. R. R.,Meighen �V 629 �Chicago, M. & St. P. Ky. Co. v. �Sioux City & St. P. R. Co 435 �Christophers, Apgar v 857 �Chung Yune v. Shurtlell 239 �Cissell V. Pulaski County 89] �Citizens' Ins. Co. v. Kountz Line. . . 768 �City of Salem, The 843, 847 �City of St. Louis, Rutz v 338 �Clark, Bookwalter v 793 �Compagnie Generale Transatlan- tique, People of the State of New �Yorkv 357 �Converse, Vermont Farm Machine �Co.v 825 �Conway County, Goldman v 888 �Cope V. Vallette Dry-dock 142 �Copes, Gavlord v 827 �Crane v. Waters 619 �Crittenden, lialaton V 2.54 �Crouch, Aldrich v 305 �Culliford & Clark, Maurjf & Co. v. . . 388 Cusimano, Lindsay, Gracie & Co. v.. S32 C\iykendall v. Miles a42 �Denver & B. G. B. Co., Dinsmore v. 210 �De Smot, The 483 �De Visser, United States v 642 �Dickinson v. Worthington 860 �Dinsmore v. Atchison, T. & 8. Fe R. Co 210 ���y. 10— Fbd. ���(V) ��� �