Page:Frontinus - The stratagems, and, the aqueducts of Rome (Bennet et al 1925).djvu/115

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Stratagems, I. x. 1–4

task, while the strong one was still vainly struggling with the tail of the weak horse, Sertorius observed: "By this illustration I have exhibited to you, my men, the nature of the Roman cohorts. They are invincible to him who attacks them in a body; yet he who assails them by groups will tear and rend them."[1]

When the same Sertorius saw his men rashly demanding the signal for battle and thought them in danger of disobeying orders unless they should engage the enemy, he permitted a squadron of cavalry to advance to harass the foe. When these troops became involved in difficulties, he sent others to their relief, and thus rescued all, showing more safely, and without injury, what would have been the outcome of the battle they had demanded. After that he found his men most amenable.[2]

When Agesilaus, the Spartan, was fighting against the Thebans and had encamped on the bank of a stream, being aware that the forces of the enemy far outnumbered his own, and wishing therefore to keep his men from the desire of fighting, he announced that he had been bidden by a response of the gods to fight on high ground. Accordingly, posting a small guard on the bank, he withdrew to the hills. The Thebans, interpreting this as a mark of fear, crossed the stream, easily dislodged the defending troops, and, following the rest too eagerly, were defeated by a smaller force, owing to the difficulties of the terrain.[3]

Scorylo, a chieftain of the Dacians, though he knew that the Romans were torn with the dissensions of the civil wars, yet did not think he ought to venture on any enterprise against them, inasmuch

  1. 80–72 B.C. Cf. Val. Max. vii. iii. 6; Plut. Sert. 16; Hor. Epist. II. i. 45 ff.; Plin.Epist. iii. ix. 11.
  2. 80–72 B.C. Cf. Plut. Sert. 16.
  3. 369 B.C. Cf. Polyaen. ii. i. 27.
69