Page:Frontinus - The stratagems, and, the aqueducts of Rome (Bennet et al 1925).djvu/81

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Stratagems, I. iv. 13–v. 1

This letter Philip arranged to have fall into the hands of the enemy. The Athenians, imagining they had secured secret intelligence of the Macedonians, withdrew their fleet, while Philip now passed through the straits with no one to hinder him.[1]

The Chersonese happened at one time to be controlled by the Athenians, and Philip was prevented from capturing it, owing to the fact that the strait was commanded by vessels not only of the Byzantines but also of the Rhodians and Chians; but Philip won the confidence of these peoples by returning their captured ships, as pledges of the peace to be arranged between himself and the Byzantines, who were the cause of the war. While the negotiations dragged on for some time and Philip purposely kept changing the details of the terms, in the interval he got ready a fleet, and eluding the enemy while they were off their guard, he suddenly sailed into the straits.[2]

When Chabrias, the Athenian, was unable to secure access to the harbour of the Samians on account of the enemy blockade, he sent a few of his own ships with orders to cross the mouth of the harbour, thinking that the enemy on guard would give chase. When the enemy were drawn away by this ruse, and no one now hindered, he secured possession of the harbour with the remainder of his fleet.[3]


V. On Escaping from Difficult Situations

When Quintus Sertorius, in the Spanish campaign, desired to cross a river while the enemy were harassing him from the rear, he had his men con-

  1. 340–339 B. C. Polyaen. iv. ii. 8 attributes this stratagem to Philip on the occasion of his march against Amphissa.
  2. 339 B. C.
  3. 388 B. C. Cf. Polyaen. iii. xi. 10, 12.
35