— Part Pakt XI.
The Relation of Agency.
I.
147
DUEATION AND TERMINATION OF AGENCY
Sect. 4. Sect.
Notice of Termination,
1.
Sect.
2.
Sect.
3.
-
......
In General Irrevocable Authority Termination by Act of Parties Termination by Operation oe Law
Sect.
PAGE -
5.
See For Agency between Bailor and Bailee Banker and Customer Barrister and Client Master and Servant Parent and Infant Partner and Firm -
-
232
-
235
Bailment.
Bankers and Banking. Barristers.
Master and Servant. Infants.
-
Partnership. Shipping
and Client and Client Wife and Husband -
Stockbroker
-
.
.
.
.
Bankruptcy, Effect oj
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
Solicitor
Auctioneers
228
and
Shipmaster Owner
title
-
228
230
...
when necessary
228
and
Naviga-
TION. Solicitors.
Stock Exchange.
Husband and Wife. Auction and Auctioneers.
Bankruptcy and
Insol-
vency. Sale of Goods.
and Sold Notes Gaming and Wagering Contracts Insurance Agents and Brokers
Brokers' Bought
Gaming and Wagering. Insurance.
-
Instruments, Rights and Liabilities of Principal and Agent on Public Agents
Negotiable
......
Trust, Liability of
Breach of
-
I,
Agent Joining in -
Valuers and Appraisers
Part
Bills of Exchange etc. Constitutional Law Authorities Public AND Public Officers.
-
-
-
—The
-
Trusts and Trustees. Valuers and AppRAisERSi
Relation of Agency.
327. The relation of agency arises whenever one person, called Definition "the agent," has authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of another, called " the principal " (a), and consents so to act. An agent is to be distinguished on the one hand from a servant. Agent disand on the other from an independent contractor. A servant acts JJ,o^^gg^vant under the direct control and supervision of his master, and is and indepenbound to conform to all reasonable orders given him in the course dent conof his work (6) an independent contractor, on the other hand, is ^^"actor. entirely independent of any control or interference, and merely
(a)
Wolff
V.
Horncastle (1798),
2 P. C. 193, 201.
prmcipal.
Authority
may
Bos. & P. 316; The Halley (1868), L. E. be implied from the subsequent assent of the
1
See pp. 173 et seq., post. v. Arnott (1817), 2 Stark. 256 ; Barnett v. South London Tramways Co. (1887), 18 Q. B. D. 815; Owen & Co. v. Cronk, [1895] 1 Q. B. 265; Yeiuens V. Noakes (1880), 6 Q. B. D. 530. See title Master and Servant. (b)
Spain
