Page:Harvard Law Review Volume 12.djvu/243

REVIEWS. 223 181 1, sold a large part of what is now Assiniboia and Manitoba to the Earl of Selkirk. He undertook to colonize it, but the attempt was not a financial success, and in 1834 the property was returned to the Hudson Bay Company. Thirty-five years later all the possessions of this Com- pany were resold to the Crown. In the course of these changes of own- ership, many grants were made to settlers ; and as a whole, they were carelessly recorded. From this fact, and from the fact that among the settlers there were frequent transfers of possession by verbal sale, or by abandonment, great confusion of title resulted ; and the unravelling of this tangle has caused endless trouble to the Canadian courts. In this book the author has endeavored, in a measure, to clear up these difiiculties by a full compilation of original grants, and by a care- ful investigation of the subsequent history of the lands comprised. An example will bring out the importance of this work. For many years it was believed, and the courts acted on the belief, that the grants by Lord Selkirk were all leaseholds. Mr. Martin has proved beyond ques- tion that the great majority were grants in fee simple. It thus appears that thousands of acres have been handed over to executors which of right should have gone to the heirs. There have been many difficulties in the way of accurate work. First, the Statute of Frauds, passed after the original grant to the Hudson's Bay Company, has never been in force as touching their possessions. The mere verbal agreements, therefore, of the early settlers passed good titles. Again, of those title documents which did exist, a large part were destroyed by fire, more by the unlawful act of a revengeful Governor, and still others by the half-breeds in the Red River rebellion. In spite of all this the author has brought together very full tables of grants. He has discovered also much that is of interest and importance regard- ing the land tenures under the different proprietors. His task has been laborious, but his contribution to the land law of Canada is correspond- ingly valuable. g. b. h. The Life of David Dudley Field. By Henry M. Field, New York : Charles Scribner's Sons. 1898. pp. 361. From the above title we are led to expect a careful, serious biography. Instead, Mr. Field has given a volume of personal recollections of his brother. He has made no attempt to describe and analyze David Field's great work in the formation of the New York Codes, no attempt even to give a complete record of the happenings of his life, passing over, for example, the unpleasant episodes which grew out of his relations with Fisk. The value of the book lies in the statement of certain facts which lay peculiarly in the author's memory. Probably no one else could tell so well of Field's immense capacity for work, of his enthusiasm for the cause of reform in the law, of his part in the nomination of Lincoln, and of his devotion to the cause of a generous reconstruction of the South. Taken as a whole, the book is not well written. The author is diffuse, over-fluent, too willing to please with gossipy anecdote, too willing to indulge in independent philosophical reflections or in irrelevant historical comment. In such a setting it is most pleasant to come upon the quota- tions from Field's own speeches, particularly from his speech before the Peace Conference of 186 1. j. p. c., jr. 29