Page:History of India Vol 2.djvu/332

290 THE GUPTA EMPIRE AND THE WHITE HUNS pass endless ages of revolution.' Thus the tyrant met the just reward of his evil deeds in another world, if not in this. The date of his death is not known exactly, but the event must have occurred in or about the year 540, just a century before Hiuen Tsang was on his travels. The rapidity of the growth of the legend concerning the portents attending the tyrant's death is good evidence of the depth of the impression made by his outlandish cruelty, which is further attested by the Kashmir tale of the fiendish pleasure which he is believed to have taken in rolling elephants down a precipice. Yasodharman, the Central Indian raja, who has been mentioned as having taken an active part in the con- federacy formed to obtain deliverance from the tyranny of Mihiragula, is known from three inscriptions only, and is not mentioned by Hiuen Tsang, who gives the credit for the victory over the Huns to Baladitya, King of Magadha. Yasodharman took the honour to him- self, and erected two columns of victory inscribed with boasting words to commemorate the defeat of the for- eign invaders. Nothing whatever is known about either his ancestry or his successors; his name stands abso- lutely alone and unrelated. The belief is therefore warranted that his reign was short and of much less importance than that claimed for it by his magniloquent inscriptions. The dominion of the White Huns in the Oxus valley did not long survive the defeat and death of Mihiragula in India. The arrival of the Turks in the middle of