Page:History of Manchester (1771), Volume 1, by John Whitaker.djvu/570

This page needs to be proofread.

INDEX. lxv CARNABH (of- Britannia Prima)— the po- sition of their dominions, p. 6x. — Subdued by the Damnonii, p. 6i and 41,}. — (of, Flavia) — their dominion* originally and poftcriorly, p. 63, 102 and 103. — When thefe became greateir, p. 105.— Subdued -in- part by the Bri mantes, p. 104, 105*— ^ (of Caledonia) — where Gtuated, p. 41 x.— for the Roman cattle, p. 177—180. Why all the Carnabii fo called, p. 102, BURY— no Roman ftanon, p. 137 and 138. 103. . ■ BUXTON — a Roman {ration p. 143 and CARNONACjE-^whcre fituated,p..4ii«  144. — Roman Roads- to it, p. 144 and CARTE— his hiltory corre&ed, p. 466— y 145. — where particularly the {ration ltaod, 469, &c. ^ASoII— 1 ftate of die provinces at this departure, p. . 471 — 480. BLACKRODE— fee Coccium. BROUGHTON (the townfhip)— all one wood in the time of the Romans, p. i7£*-a " great nuriery for the Roman cattle, p. 1 76, and 179, 180.' (the valley)— -a great pailure p. 144.— why the Romans had a ftation at C Buxton, p. r j.^. — what Buxton was aiTu- redly called ny the Romans, p. 146.— • where the Roman Bath flood, p. 147. C. CALEDONIA— where the Proner Caledo- • nians were rttuated, p. 41 1 . — Why fo cal- led, p. 41 c, and 439, 446. — Why all the tribes to the north of the Friths were fo called, p. 414, 41 5 * — Why fomeof them alfo called Maiatx, p. 415. — Why fome < t>f them attb called Deucaledones, ibid.— • Why all of them called alfo Pi*Sb, 415 — » 417.— Why all catted Cruthenich, p. 424. The vain repeated attempts of the Romans to fubduc Caledonia in general, p. 417—* ' 420.— The irruptions of the Caledonians into the provinces, p. 420, &c. CALLEVA— what, p. 60. CAMS) ALA— what, p. 61. CAMBODUNUM— its distance from Man- • cunium in the Roman Itineraries, p. 80, -the pofition and extent of their dominions originally and pofteriourly, p. 62 and 413. CASTLEFIELD (near Mancheiter) — ac- knowledged by all the antiquarians to have been the fire of a Roman fhtion, and to be denominated Mancunium in the Roman Itinerary, p. x. — previoufly the fite of a

  • Britilh town in the woods, p. - — 4.—

When and why fo made, p. 1 8 — 20. — " -The nature of this Britifh, town, p. 19— 2.$.— Britim. remains difcovered in the^ CailJcfield, p. 20—25. — Roman remains difcovered there, p. 22 — 23, ^ — 38, 42— 47, and $r— 52. — Roman-Britiih remains, P« y>$> 304. — A fort built there by the . Romans, and when, p. 31, 32. — HoWj built, p. 32, &c— With what lime, p. -34. -—The remains and appearance of the fort, defcribed, p.35 — 38^— -How difpofed with- in, p- 40, &c. — How difpofed without, p. 42, ficc. — Its Roman avenue defcribed, p. 81. 81. — The road to it from Mancuniura CASTLEHILL (near Manchester) — a fully traced, p. 8i-— 86.— Its actual poll- fmall Roman ftation, and for what ufe, p. tion at laft difcovered, p. 87.— Connder- x 78, &c. able remains there, p, 88, 89.— Called alfo CASTLESHAW (in Saddleworth) — mod Camulodunum, and why, p. 91. — Why called Cambodunum,p. 91.— when de- ftwyed, p> 92. CAMuIX>»UNTJM— what, p. 62.— why fo called, p. 91 and 93. CANGII — what, how many of them, and • • where fituated, p. 1 2 and x £9.— An inferip- tiorr concerning theCheihire Cangii, that probably a Britiih fortrefs, p. 91. — Britifh remains found there, p. qi and 92.— A (mall Roman flation, and tor what ufe, p. CATEATON (a ftreet in Manchcfter)— one fide of it lieth in the hollow of the great fofle belonging to the fuxnmer camp of the o «, - Roma ns, p. 18*. afcertaint their particular pofition, and gives CATTIEUCHLANI— who they were, ans us fome notes of their hifteiy, p. 157—* what the name means, p. 66. 1 60. CATINI— where fituated, p. 41 x >— fubduej CANTdJ— -where fituated, p. 41 1. . by the Carnabii, ibid. CANTII— the original and pofterior extent CELTS— their nature and tile, p. 13 — 16. of their dominions before the coming of T wo Manchefter Celts, p. 14— -i6 ? * the Romans, p. 60 and 41 a w What CENOMANNI — their dominions, p. 6u was their capital, p. 6o«— A commercial ,— why fo called, p. 149. people, p. 70.— The original authors pro* CERONES— where fituated, jp»' 41 2. bably of the Watlbg-ftrect, p. 68—70. CHESHIRE— by whom Eaft-Chefhire was Yyy 2 inhabited