Page:History of Woman Suffrage Volume 6.djvu/306

292 HISTORY OF WOMAN SUFFRAGE absolute control, the suffragists had endeavored to have it changed. Bill after bill, drawn by Samuel E. Sewall and others, had been introduced and rejected and it required a tragedy to obtain a new law. Mrs. Naramore of Coldbrook, Mass., went insane and killed her six young children when she learned that their father intended to give them away and could legally do so. This deeply stirred the Rev. Charles H. Talmage, who had con- ducted the funeral service, with the six little coffins ranged before the pulpit. He made a careful inquiry into all the cir- cumstances and gave a full account of them in the Boston Herald of April 15, 1901 (republished in the Woman's Journal of April 27). He gave his time and the State Suffrage Association paid his expenses while he went through the State enlisting the support of different organizations of women to secure a change in the law. Mr. Blackwell also put in much time for this purpose. When the Equal Guardianship bill was introduced by Repre- sentative George H. Fall of Maiden it was backed not only by the suffrage association but by the State Federation of Women's Clubs, the State W. C. T. U., the Women's Relief Corps, the Boston Children's Friend Society and more than a hundred other organizations, aggregating 34,000 women. Among them the Anti-Suffrage Association was not included. For six years it had been circulating, under its official imprint, a leaflet against the proposal to give mothers equal custody and control of the children and in defense of the law as it stood. The Committee on Probate and Chancery reported adversely by 8 to 3. The outlook for its passage seemed so dark that Mr. Fall came to the Woman's Journal office and asked if it might not be better to drop it and await a more propitious time. Miss Blackwell urged him to push it to a test. On May 27 it was debated in the House. Representative Marshall of Glouces- ter said that the Probate Judges were all opposed to it ; that its advocates were "sentimentalists" and that "it would create strife, separation and divorce." He added : "Those who appeared for it before the committee were practically the same crowd that appeared for woman suffrage." Representative Sleeper ex- claimed: "If you want to enact legislation which will disrupt the home and sunder the tenderest and most sacred relations,