Page:History of Woman Suffrage Volume 6.djvu/53

CALIFORNIA 39 Women's Equal Suffrage League and other organizations in the North, and the Political Equality League of Los Angeles, also pub- lished countless thousands of leaflets, besides ordering many from the National Association. Under the tactful management of Mrs. Ringrose, 50,000 Catholic leaflets were distributed at the doors of Catholic churches. The picture slides and stereopticon talks, superin- tended by Mrs. Lucretia Watson Taylor, were very effective, par- ticularly in the outlying districts. Posters, pennants and banners played a conspicuous part in the campaign. The attendance at the meetings held in theaters, churches, halls and on the street corners was surprisingly large and in many instances splendidly enthusiastic. The attitude of the public generally was respectful and often pro- foundly sympathetic. Our country clubs and county organizations followed closely the plans recommended by the State association. It was purely an educational campaign, without one shadow of parti- sanship or militant methods. The victory in the State of Washing- ton in 1910 and the manner in which the enfranchised women used their newly acquired power contributed much to the success in Cali- fornia. The pulpit and the press were also largely with us. We worked hard to make sure of these two great instrumentalities for the education of the people. Our inland co-workers largely financed their own special lines of propaganda. The generous contributions of the National Associa- tion and the smaller personal donations through that body, amounting altogether to about $1,800, and the noble work of the national vice- president, Mrs. Catharine Waugh McCulloch, were a large factor in our success. The Woman Suffrage Party of New York sent us able speakers. Among our many good fortunes was the coming of the National Education Association convention to San Francisco. Miss Gail Laughlin was of immense service as a speaker and as chairman of the Election Committee. . . . The State association disbursed about $10,000, not counting the expenses in Southern California. Mrs. Keith contributed $3,000 within the year; Mrs. Anna K. Bidwell $1,000 through the State treasury, besides assisting her own county organization. Mrs. Charles D. Blaney gave generous sums, while others in an equally liberal spirit donated from $200 down to one, according to their means; and others again, having no gold or precious stones, gave what was best of all, themselves, nobly, untiringly, out of their love for justice. No active work in suffrage was done in Southern California for some years after the defeat of 1896. In November, 1900, the State president, Mrs. Mary Wood Swift, went to Los Angeles, a parlor meeting was held and later a public address was given by IKT at the Woman's Hub House. Here it was determined to revive the Woman Suffr igue and an executive committee