Page:Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia.pdf/1

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

KIEFEL CJ,

BELL, GAGELER, KEANE, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJ



JENNIFER HOCKING
APPELLANT

AND

DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF AUSTRALIA
RESPONDENT

Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia
[2020] HCA 19
Date of Hearing: 4 & 5 February 2020
Date of Judgment: 29 May 2020
S262/2019

ORDER

1. Appeal allowed.

2. Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 8 February 2019 and, in their place, order that:

(a) the appeal to the Full Court be allowed;
(b) the orders of Griffiths J made on 16 March 2018 be set aside and, in their place, it be:
(i) declared that the contents of Record AA1984/609 ("the deposited correspondence") constitute Commonwealth records within the meaning of the Archives Act 1983 (Cth);
(ii) ordered that a writ of mandamus issue to compel the Director-General of the National Archives of Australia to reconsider Professor Hocking's request for access to the deposited correspondence; and