as to suggest that they are immediately derived from him.[1]
Dr. von Prantl, therefore, maintains that if genuine they
can only be placed among Rabanus s latest productions,
and thinks that they have been wrongly attributed to him.
Dr. von Prantl s reasoning does not appear quite decisive,
and the conflict asserted to exist between the views con
tained in these glosses and in Rabanus’s other works is
not perhaps so substantial as to be fatal to their common
authorship. Nor is it impossible that the former are
independent of John Scotus s influence.
The next symptom of a nominalistic tendency appears in certain glosses in a Paris manuscript (now numbered Fonds Latin 12,949), of which specimens are given by Cousin and M. Haureau. The latter, and before him h Charles de Remusat, claimed their authorship for Heric of Auxerre. Dr. von Prantl, on the contrary, i considers the major part to be by another, though contemporary, writer. But he is in error in saying that the codex itself gives a different author to one section of the glosses in dispute (those on the Isagoge). It is true that the line,
lepa hunc scripsi glossans utcunque libellum,
stands in f . 52 b, but lepa, which Cousin had noted with a query, is a later insertion, written over an erasure with room for about seven letters. This point was ascertained for me by the kindness of M. G. Saige.[2]
The logical summary found in a metrical version in another Paris manuscript, to which k Dr. von Prantl refers, can hardly be admitted as material for the history of the time before Roscelin, until we are better informed about Append., its date. Cousin, who prints these hexameters, J describes 669. 47 them as of the tenth or eleventh century, and hints the possibility that they were dedicated to a man who died
- ↑ Extracts are printed by Victor Cousin, Ouvrages inedits d Abe- lard, intr., pp. xvii, Ixxviii, Ixxix, and app., pp. 613 sqq.
- ↑ [Subsequent examination has shown that the word is not lepa but lepa, and it has been suggested that the letter.? are the beginning of a Greek name, possibly ICPAHA. See L. Traube, in Neues Archiv, 18 (1892) 105, and E. K. Rand, Johannes Scottus, p. 84; 1906.]
