Page:Isis very much unveiled - being the story of the great Mahatma hoax (IA b24884273).pdf/142

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
134
ISIS VERY MUCH UNVEILED.

Judge directly or indirectly admits. Those which I have referred to as produced by Mr. Judge included the following:—

  • The Cabinet missive.
  • The “Note the Seal” missive.
  • The “Judge’s Plan is Right” missive.
  • The “Masters Watch us” missive.
  • The “Judge is the friend” missive.
  • The “Master agrees” missive.
  • The Envelope Trick missive.
  • The “I withold” missive.
  • The Telegram missive.
  • The “Master will Provide” missive.
  • The Inner Group missive.
  • The “Grave Danger Olcott” missive.
  • The “Follow Judge and Stick” missive.
  • The “Judge is not the Forger” missive.
  • The Poison Threat missive.

(Besides these I have referred to other Mahatma letters or endorsements on letters, on bank-notes, &c.; but those enumerated will do for the present.)

Out of all these Mr. Judge disputes only two. As regards the “Note the Seal” missive, all that he denies is the statement that it was he who drew the special attention of the Inner Group to the seal upon it—a denial which I shall deal with presently. He demies the whole story of the Cabinet missive, and in regard to the “Judge is not the Forger” missive, he denies that it was fabricated by him, but suggests that it was fabricated by some other Theosophist.

The facts about the whole of the remaining thirteen (and more) missives he thus implicitly admits, using such general phrases as these:—“Several of the contested messages are genuine ones”; “they were all good and true”; “they were from the Master”; “I have not admitted her [Mrs. Besant’s] contention” [that they were only psychically from the Master, and were written in Mahatmascript by Judge]; and, finally, “I will not tell how or by what means they were produced.” The “Grave Danger Olcott” missive, by the way, he admits explicitly.

It is for the Theosophists, therefore, now to consider whether the substance of these admitted missives (to say nothing of this “Reply,” in which also Mr. Judge asserts the Master’s collaboration) squares with their conception of “the Master of Wisdom,” that “god-like” exemplar of “the perfectibility of man,” as his own “Messenger” describes him. The Two Contested Missives. The reason why Mr. Judge selected just these two for denial is, no