Wikisource

Page:JT International SA v Commonwealth of Australia.pdf/43

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Gummow J

33.

not engaged. This presents two questions. The first is whether there is a "taking" or "deprivation" of the property of the plaintiffs and, if so, the second question is whether the Packaging Act effects an "acquisition" of property otherwise than on just terms as proscribed by s 51(xxxi) of the Constitution. The distinction between the two questions appears from the pithy statement of Gibbs CJ, Wilson, Brennan, Deane and Dawson JJ[1] to the effect that rights of property may be extinguished without being acquired. The submissions of the plaintiffs, in some instances directly, and in others with more subtlety, sought to displace or diminish the importance of that second question. That attempt was contrary to established authority in this Court.

For the reasons which follow, there is sufficient impairment, at least of the statutory intellectual property of the plaintiffs, to amount to a "taking", but there is no acquisition of any property. The result is the plaintiffs' cases for invalidity fail.

Section 51(xxxi) of the Constitution and statutory entitlements

In Wurridjal v The Commonwealth[2] Crennan J said of s 51(xxxi):

"It can be significant that rights which are diminished by subsequent legislation are statutory entitlements. Where a right which has no existence apart from statute is one that, of its nature, is susceptible to modification, legislation which effects a modification of that right is not necessarily legislation with respect to an acquisition of property within the meaning of s 51(xxxi)[3]. It does not follow, however, that all rights which owe their existence to statute are ones which, of their nature, are susceptible to modification[4], as the contingency of subsequent legislative

  1. ↑ R v Ludeke; Ex parte Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation (1985) 159 CLR 636 at 653; [1985] HCA 84.
  2. ↑ (2009) 237 CLR 309 at 439–440 [363]–[364]; [2009] HCA 2. See also Attorney-General (NT) v Chaffey (2007) 231 CLR 651 at 664 [23]–[25]; [2007] HCA 34.
  3. ↑ Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (1994) 179 CLR 297 at 305–306 per Mason CJ, Deane and Gaudron JJ; [1994] HCA 6; Health Insurance Commission v Peverill (1994) 179 CLR 226 at 237 per Mason CJ, Deane and Gaudron JJ; [1994] HCA 8.
  4. ↑ The Commonwealth v WMC Resources Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 1 at 16–17 [16] per Brennan CJ; [1998] HCA 8
Retrieved from "https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Page:JT_International_SA_v_Commonwealth_of_Australia.pdf/43&oldid=13494945"