Wikisource

Page:JT International SA v Commonwealth of Australia.pdf/46

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

Gummow J

36.

the valuable right or privilege to use the other assets of the business as a business to produce income. It is the right or privilege to make use of all that constitutes 'the attractive force which brings in custom'[1]. Goodwill is correctly identified as property[2], therefore, because it is the legal right or privilege to conduct a business in substantially the same manner and by substantially the same means that have attracted custom to it. It is a right or privilege that is inseparable from the conduct of the business[3]."

And, as Windeyer J emphasised in Colbeam Palmer[4], protection of property is the foundation in equity of the passing-off action. Further, it is well established that such an action may protect the goodwill derived from slogans and visual images which build up an association with the business of the plaintiff[5].

However, it should be borne in mind that all these items of "property" are, as Higgins J put it[6], "artificial products of society", not "physical objects" the boundaries of each class of which "are fixed by external nature"; more precisely, as Isaacs J emphasised with respect to trade marks, these are not affirmative rights like the property in goods and are not rights "in gross, or in the abstract"[7].

These considerations direct further attention to the identification of those rights which constitute the property in question in these cases. This is an essential first step in the identification of that of which there has been a

  1. ↑ Inland Revenue Commissioners v Muller & Co's Margarine Ltd [1901] AC 217 at 223–224.
  2. ↑ Potter v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (1854) 10 Ex 147 at 159 [156 ER 392 at 396]; Muller [1901] AC 217 at 223; Bacchus Marsh Concentrated Milk (1919) 26 CLR 410 at 438; Bollinger v Costa Brava Wine Co Ltd [1960] Ch 262 at 275.
  3. ↑ Smale v Graves (1850) 3 De G & Sm 706 [64 ER 670]; Wedderburn v Wedderburn (1856) 22 Beav 84 at 104 [52 ER 1039 at 1047]; Smith v Everett (1859) 27 Beav 446 [54 ER 175]; Robertson v Quiddington (1860) 28 Beav 529 [54 ER 469]; Hall v Barrows (1863) 4 De GJ & S 150 [46 ER 873]; Muller [1901] AC 217 at 224; Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Just Jeans Pty Ltd (1987) 16 FCR 110.
  4. ↑ (1968) 122 CLR 25 at 33–34. See also Grain Pool of Western Australia v The Commonwealth (2000) 202 CLR 479 at 499 [35]; [2000] HCA 14.
  5. ↑ ConAgra Inc v McCain Foods (Aust) Pty Ltd (1992) 33 FCR 302 at 366.
  6. ↑ Union Label Case (1908) 6 CLR 469 at 611.
  7. ↑ Henry Clay & Bock & Co Ltd v Eddy (1915) 19 CLR 641 at 655; [1915] HCA 33.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Page:JT_International_SA_v_Commonwealth_of_Australia.pdf/46&oldid=13494948"